Towards national policy for open source hardware research: The case of Finland

From Appropedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sunhusky.png Michigan Tech's Open Sustainability Technology Lab.

Wanted: Students to make a distributed future with solar-powered open-source 3-D printing and recycling.
Contact Dr. Joshua Pearce - Apply here

MOST: Projects & Publications, Methods, Lit. reviews, People, Sponsors, News
Updates: Twitter, YouTube

Create-Joshua-Pearce.png


Pearce Publications: Energy Conservation Energy Policy Industrial SymbiosisLife Cycle Analysis Materials Science Open Source Photovoltaic Systems Solar CellsSustainable Development Sustainability Education


Finopenhardware.png

Source

I.T.S.Heikkinen H.Savin, J.Partanen, J.Seppälä, J.M.Pearce. Towards national policy for open source hardware research: The case of Finland.Technological Forecasting and Social Change 155, (2020), 119986.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119986 open access

Abstract

Free and open-source hardware (FOSH) is rapidly gaining momentum because it provides customized research hardware with over 90% savings compared to the costs of proprietary tools. However, the focused skill sets of researchers who aim to facilitate their own research limit FOSH complexity. The most expensive research equipment normally requires an interdisciplinary team. To overcome this complexity barrier and obtain large returns on investment for research funders by replacing the most expensive proprietary research equipment with FOSH, new development funding mechanisms are needed. To guide such research policy, this paper provides the first analysis of the strategic national benefit of applying the FOSH approach to major research equipment for any nation. The results of an example analysis for a single nation indicate Finland's science funders could save between 2.84–27.7m€/year directly on scientific equipment purchases if research hardware is converted to FOSH and the nation would likely garner the well-established concomitant benefits of increased research innovation within their economy. Finally, a detailed generalized model for determining national research policy in hardware development is derived and research policy mechanisms for accelerating FOSH deployment and greater accessibility to research equipment are discussed.

Highlights[edit | edit source]

  • Free and open-source hardware (FOSH) is documented for research hardware.
  • Simple FOSH reduce costs over 90% compared to proprietary tools.
  • Opportunity to fund complex FOSH.
  • Finland's science funders could save between 2.84–27.7m€/year with FOSH.
  • Generalized model for determining national research policy in hardware development.

Keywords[edit | edit source]

Open Source, Open Source Hardware, Libre Hardware, Business Models, Innovation; Economics of science; Equipment; Research tools; Research expenditures

See also[edit | edit source]

News[edit | edit source]

  1. Free and Open-Source Hardware enables more bang for your buck in research funding- Aalto News 17.5k
    1. Techxplore 70k
    2. Technology.org 99.9k
    3. Eureka Alert 17.7k
    4. The Latest News 211k
    5. News 8 Plus 488k
    6. Science Codex 695k
  2. ‘Open Design’: Printing research hardware to save on capitol costs Lab News (UK)