Food dehydration is both a desirable and appropriate technology for many reasons which include increasing the shelf-life of food without having to use refrigeration, and reducing product size which can maximize storage space. Also, the process of dehydration is used to enhance foodstuffs directly (e.g. jerky, fruit leather) and indirectly (e.g. spices).
The main principle behind food dehydration is simple: to remove an ample quantity, or the majority (depending on the desired product), of water content from food products. Since the water content of foods is high, 80-95% in many fruits/vegetables and 75% or less in meats, the product weighs much less, and its volume is reduced. Also, without water, the food becomes an unfavorable medium for the growth of bacteria or fungi. If dehydrated when ripe, determined from a nutritional standpoint, the maximum quantity of nutrients can be preserved.
Food dehydration has traditionally been done by simply laying food out in the sun to dry, climate/weather permitting. With the right food, in the right conditions, there may be little need to improve upon this simple setup. However, there are a handful of reasons people have sought other ways to dehydrate their food. Some practical reasons include avoiding the risk of exposing the food to animals which could take and eat the food, or insects which may want to lay eggs in it. A more scientific reason would be to avoid nutrient degradation that would occur from prolonged exposure to the sunlight. In addition, there exists the potential of wrongly interpreting/predicting the weather and having spoilage from rain or lack of sun.
To answers these concerns, the modern food dehydrator is designed to produce hot air and distribute it equally inside a light-less chamber or cabinet. Included in this design is the control of the air's temperature and the duration of hot air distribution. As a result, many modern food dehydrators rely on electricity, rather than the Sun, to create and distribute hot air in a uniform and uninterrupted fashion.
The Plan[edit | edit source]
The idea of creating a hybrid solar food dehydrator, that also adhered to as many of the principles of modern food dehydration as possible sounded excellent to me. The potential of using this old system in new ways can save both power and materials. The original goal was to produce a solar dehydrator that had an upfront cost similar to a conventional dehydrator, but used less industrialized materials in addition to harnessing the sun's energy, which reduces the energy impact associated with conventional food dehydration (discussed later).
Could I construct something that would do this with the limited knowledge I have about solar design? These designs on the Internet ([http://web.archive.org/web/20110308024557/http://www.thefarm.org:80/charities/i4at/surv/soldehyd.htm -- broken link?) gave me confidence that I could...
Food Dehydration[edit | edit source]
Food Preparation[edit | edit source]
While the actual process of dehydrating food is hands-free, some minor preparation is (usually) recommended. Also, when dehydrating meat, curing is the last step.
- Cut into Pieces of Reasonable Thickness: 3/8-1/2"
- Acidifying or Adding Sugar to Fruit: In order to preserve vitamin content and avoid browning fruits such as apples. Lemon juice, which contains citric acid, may be applied to the fruit's exposed surfaces. However, most fruits don't require this.
- Blanching Vegetables: To make re-hydration easier, vegetables that have hard cell structures are blanched so that they are slightly softened. Vegetables that may need this treatment include: beans, broccoli, carrots, cauliflower, celery, and peas.
- Curing Meat: In order to kill any potential bacteria left in the meat after dehydration, the meat is cured by placing it in a warm oven (160 F) for 1 hour.
Electric Food Dehydrator[edit | edit source]
To serve as a control and as a reliable counterpart for comparison, a conventional electric food dehydrator was obtained and used. It pros and cons were evaluated from experience. Pros:
- Easy to use
- High Electricity Demand (350W-1000W or more)/High Operating Cost
- Impractically expensive for a small farm to consider using
- Small loads are also unreasonable at this operating cost, for anyone
Using the Electric Food Dehydrator[edit | edit source]
Fruits and Veggies[edit | edit source]
Meat[edit | edit source]
Design Considerations[edit | edit source]
Temperature, Airflow, and Drying Time[edit | edit source]
A “low heat of a minimum of 120o F to a maximum of 185o F" is the recommended range of air temperature with which most foods are conventionally dehydrated with success. Airflow around the product being dehydrated is required, but does not have to be forced. That is, passive airflow proves not only sufficient, but sometimes better than forced-air flow because it has a tendency to dry the outside much faster than the inside, causing “crusting”. (Wheeler, 15) Different foods have different moisture contents, and therefore different drying times. Also, different appliances or drying systems, because they vary in airflow, temperature, and overall design efficacy, will vary in drying rate.
The goal is two fold in supplying the correct air temperature:
- Have the temperature low enough such that cooking or crusting of the food is avoided, removing moisture evenly, and mineral/vitamin content is not degraded to a significant extent.
- Have the temperature high enough to inactivate the enzymes that lead to fermentation or spoilage.
Angle of Incidence[edit | edit source]
The most important aspect of design in the solar dehydrator was to maximize the energy captured from the Sun, especially given the climate we are in which averages the equivalent of 4 hours of full sunlight per day in the Summer here in Arcata, CA. The angle of incidence is first principle to adhere to when aiming to capture as much incoming solar radiation as possible. It describes the angle that the Sun's light is penetrating the Earth at. A 90 degree angle is the highest angle of incidence and represents the angle at which the most energy can be captured from the Sun. The solar equator is the line around the Earth where the Sun penetrates at a 90 degree angle. Because of the angle of incidence, the equator receives the greatest amount of light energy from the Sun. Wishing to emulate this effect, the proper angle to tilt the solar collector is roughly equivalent to your degrees latitude (ignoring seasonal variance).
Insulation[edit | edit source]
The only significant difference between my design and the design it was modeled after is the addition of insulation. The bottom and sides of the solar collector, as well as the sides of the solar food dehydrator were insulated by a 1 cm gap that was stuffed with organic cotton. Since the primary mechanism of the solar food dehydrator was to facilitate the flow of heat through the unit, I wanted heat loss to the outside environment to be at a minimum.
Materials[edit | edit source]
|Table 1. Solar Food Dehydrator (Materials) Cost
|Table 2. Electric Food Dehydrator Cost
Design Sketches[edit | edit source]
The design from the Internet was adapted to fit the materials I had. Also depicted is the sketch that inspired the interlocking mechanism that allowed me to insulate the solar collector and solar food dehydrator.
Construction[edit | edit source]
Here are some pictures of the actual construction process. All the pieces had to be cut to size, then grooves were cut into each piece as it was added to the other pieces. Wire brads were set in place to connect the pieces, then tape was used to seal all the edges. Finally, finishing touches were added such as adding the plastic wrap to the solar collector and pinning cheese cloth inside the solar food dehydrator.
Testing[edit | edit source]
After determining that I would most likely have problems dehydrating fruits and vegetables, I put my dehydrator to use on some items of minute mass: herbs. Pictured is some cilantro drying by the window. The dehydrator has a lid (not pictured) that covers 95% of the top while in operation, leaving 5% open near the back edge to allow for passive airflow.
Results[edit | edit source]
Tables[edit | edit source]
|Table 3. Solar Food Dehydrator Efficacy Data
|Table 4. Electric Food Dehydrator Drying Times
Other Important Data Gathered[edit | edit source]
Electric Food Dehydrator Running Temperature: 142o F
Solar Collector Area: 160.1 in2
Solar Food Dehydrator Volume: 596.1 in3
Arcata Daily Solar Equivalence: 4 hours full sun
Mathematical Inquiry[edit | edit source]
Determining how big the solar collector should have been required extrapolating the collected data. First, I figured out how many degrees the temperature inside the dehydrator would have been raised had 100% of the solar collector been receiving light. This gave a maximum range for the solar collector's area. Then, using the previously determined answers, the total surface area required to achieve a desired temperature of 140o F (comparable to the electric food dehydrator) was calculated.
Step 1. Determining Maximum Increase in Temperature From Solar Collector:
[ ( Dehydrator Temperature - Ambient Temperature ) / % Collector Exposed, as decimal ]
Trial 1 Maximum: 17.65o F
Trial 2 Maximum: 16.00o F, Maximum Range: 16-17.65o F
Step 2. Determining Surface Area Required to Achieve Desired Temperature with Fixed Dehydrator Volume of 596.1 in3:
Surface Area * [ ( Desired Temperature - Ambient Temperature ) / Maximum Increase in Temperature From 160.1 in^2 Solar Collector ]
Surface Area Required to Achieve 140o F: 589.6-700.4 in2
Anticipated Drying Times in Arcata, CA[edit | edit source]
Using 4 hours of full sunlight as the daily solar equivalence, the drying times above were recalculated for the solar food dehydrator, both with its current and ideal solar collector sizes. To do this, the ideal size of the solar collector was approximated at being 3 2/3X the size of the original.
The calculations are as follows:
Days in Ideal Solar Food Dehydrator = [ Hours Drying Time / (Day / Daily Solar Equivalence) ]
Days in Current Solar Dehydrator = [ Days in Ideal Solar Food Dehydrator / (1 / (X Current Surface Area)) ]
|Table 5. Ideal Solar Food Dehydrator Drying Times
|Table 6. Current Solar Food Dehydrator Drying Times
**Note: These drying times are so long, the food is likely to go bad.
Recommendations[edit | edit source]
|Design Aspect||How to Improve|
Considerations[edit | edit source]
If you Go Solar... One thing I didn't mention already that should be considered should anyone be looking to build their own solar food dehydrator after looking at this page, is how messy it can be, or rather, what kind of mess the food you're dehydrating can leave in your dehydrator. If you haven't dehydrated food before, you might not know this. The point here is that whatever gets dirty, you need to be able to clean. Removable/Reusable or Single-use components should be part of the system (i.e. Single-use cheescloth and plate, or removable wire rack and tray).
If you Go Electric... From what I experienced, the 350W, cheaper, less energy-intensive electric dehydrator I chose to use would be quite sufficient for the average home user. The 1000W model looked nice, and came with a temperature adjustment, but generally accomplishes the same ends through more energy-intensive means. Also, buying a timer for the dehydrator is a good way to take control over your energy usage and drying precision.
More Pictures[edit | edit source]
Resources[edit | edit source]
Books[edit | edit source]
- Fodor, Eben V. "The Solar Food Dryer: How to Make and Use Your Own Low-Cost, High Performance, Sun-Powered Food Dehydrator," 2006. New Society Publishers.
- Nichols, Naomi. “Food Drying At Home,” 1978. David & Charles (Publishers) Limited.
- Wheeler, emme. “Home Food Dehydration, The Hows, What and Why,” 1974. Seattle, Washington.
Useful Links[edit | edit source]
- Solar Food Dehydrator
- Solar Food Dryers
- Make a Solar Drier
- Projects: Drying Foods With the Sun
- Food Drying
- El Paso Solar Energy Association: Solar Food Drying
- A Review of Solar Food Drying
- U.S. Department of Energy. “Passive Solar Design Technology Factsheet,”
Here are 3 other, nice passive solar models: Three Solar Food Dehydrators
Credits[edit | edit source]
|Cal Poly Humboldt|