Fionaconnor (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Fionaconnor (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
**EDITS: added status, changed description, changed intended use, added keywords, changed to 'made' | **EDITS: added status, changed description, changed intended use, added keywords, changed to 'made' | ||
To expedite editing, I will no longer list simple edits made, only concerns... | '''To expedite editing, I will no longer list simple edits made, only concerns...''' | ||
*[[Bike rack]] | *[[Bike rack]] |
Revision as of 20:19, 25 June 2020
Description
The purpose of this page is to discuss comments/concerns about implementing infoboxes on Appropedia pages.
Comments
- "Backpack" Snap-fit Clips
- EDITS: shortened description, added keywords, added status
- TO-DO: delete duplicate description
- 2 Liter Winnower
- EDITS: added status, added keywords, updated intended use, changed to not made (did not find evidence of model/prototype, just design)
- 3-D printable open source dual axis gimbal system for optoelectronic measurements
- EDITS: changed description, added keywords to inbox
- CONCERN: should status be "verified" or "verified technology" (or something else)
- 3-D printable photovoltaic module spacer
- EDITS: added status, added keywords, shortened description
- 3-D printable solar charger
- EDITS: added keywords, added status, added more SDGS
- CONCERN: intended use --> development and industry work but this could be used at home as well (not really hobbyism though)--> added "individual use" (open to changing--> maybe personal device?)
- 3-D Printing Solar Photovoltaic Racking in Developing World
- EDITS: added status, shortened description, added to intended use
- 3D Print Speculum
- EDITS: added status, shortened description, added to intended use, added keywords
- 3D Printable Cider Press
- EDITS: added status, changed description, changed intended use, added keywords, changed to 'made'
To expedite editing, I will no longer list simple edits made, only concerns...
- Bike rack
- Concern: this page does not have any design files, images, or design descriptions, so I listed the project status as an "Idea" rather than "Design" (no evidence of a design)
- Clamps with gearing system
- Concern: I removed the verified status due to lack of evidence
- Dust Mask
- Concern: This page has the following status levels listed: designed, prototyped, deployed, modeled, verified. I do not see evidence of anything past prototyped, so I removed deployed and verified. (Open to changing this back).
- GPS Belt Clip, Improved GPS Belt Clip, Ice Scraper, Lightweight Wrenches
- Concern: Unsure if any SDGs relate
General Comments
- I have focused on editing/adding to description, intended use, keywords, development stage, made, and SDGs.
- Intended uses that I added to the previous list: agriculture, transportation, medical, shelter, cooking
- It is helpful to have a concise description
- should be an edited down version of the abstract rather than the entire abstract
- There should be proof of prototype existence (ie photo of print) to be given prototype status
- There should be proof of outside verification and/or data from creator's tests to be given verified status
- Made-Independently
- To clarify, this means that someone other than the creator made the technology using the creator's design
- Or, does it mean that the design is not unique and has been made before?
- If it's the former, I don't believe the pages are all correct-- pretty much all prototypes would not have been made independently at this point
- I've occasionally removed the yes, but have not been consistently focusing on this category. I'm definitely willing to go back and update all of the pages once I fully understand