TissueDB/Guides/3D printing service guide
3D printing guides · 3D model preparation guide
Use this guide when a printing service, laboratory or colleague will produce a simulator component. You do not need to install a slicer. You need to identify the files and requirements well enough for the provider to propose a suitable manufacturing route and return an inspectable part.
Purpose and before you start
[edit | edit source]Open the simulator's build instructions and complete the model and requirements checks in the 3D model preparation guide. The source may specify the anatomy, a casting mould or a structural component; name the part you are ordering. Identify the person responsible for resolving a missing requirement or proposed change.
Do not order from the material name alone. The same polymer name can occur in different manufacturing processes. The provider's quote should describe the actual process, product and finished state.
Understand the workflow
[edit | edit source]- You identify the component, source files and requirements.
- The provider checks completeness, licence conditions and equipment compatibility.
- You resolve any proposed change against the simulator's requirements.
- The provider prepares the machine-specific job and completes the agreed manufacturing and finishing operations.
- You inspect the delivered component and retain the build record before assembly.
Use this production brief after you identify the model files. Agree the manufacturing requirements with the provider before placing an order.
Decide who will prepare the print
[edit | edit source]Ask who will prepare the job, operate the equipment, remove temporary supports, perform finishing and inspect the result. A colleague may do all these tasks, or a service may divide them between operators. Record the responsibility for each task so that no finishing or inspection step is assumed to happen elsewhere.
If you already have a machine-ready file, identify its original printer, hardware and material configuration. Let the provider determine whether it is applicable. Usually the provider prepares a new job from the agreed geometry for its own equipment. STL surface geometry and machine-specific output are distinct.[1]
Confirm the model and requirements
[edit | edit source]Copyable service brief
[edit | edit source]Copy this table into the build record. Fill unknown items with “unresolved” and identify the missing source; an empty cell can be mistaken for no requirement.
Diagram description: The file outline contains a faceted solid. It represents model geometry.
| Field | Complete before production |
|---|---|
| Simulator and source | Canonical simulator page; developer project or paper; source revision/date |
| Components and quantities | Each component name, role and quantity; matched sets and optional variants identified |
| Model identity | Exact filenames/folders, model revision or release, download date and checksum when available |
| Permitted use | Geometry licence/permission and required attribution; modification, redistribution and service-printing conditions |
| Process and material | Specified process; exact material product/grade/version, colour and other source requirements |
| Size and fit | Intended units; reference and critical dimensions; mating parts, side and permitted scale |
| Structure and protected features | Required orientation, walls, internal structure, support constraints, threads, sealing surfaces and openings |
| Finished state | Cooling/removal; support removal; washing, drying, curing or other applicable finishing; permitted surface work |
| Inspection | Required checks, acceptance criteria, method and responsible reviewer |
| Proposed provider configuration | Printer, material/product, relevant hardware, software/profile and finishing equipment |
| Changes and unresolved items | Each proposed deviation, reason, source requirement affected and resolution before production |
| Returned record | Actual configuration, finishing performed, inspection results, deviations and component identifiers |
Check. The provider can distinguish required values from proposed choices, and can identify each file's role.
If the check fails. Resolve the specific gap before ordering. A provider's ability to print a shape does not establish that it satisfies a simulator's requirements.
Prepare the equipment, material and file
[edit | edit source]The provider should confirm that its equipment supports the specified material/process and can accommodate the complete job. Ask it to identify any necessary change to orientation, scale, internal structure or supports. Obtain the proposal before the geometry is modified.
Keep the original files. Any permitted repair or design change needs a separate version and a comparison of the critical features. A service should not silently hollow a solid part, close a lumen or substitute an “ABS-like” resin for specified ABS filament.
Ask for the agreed workspace and handling arrangements relevant to the process. NIOSH covers exposures during preparation, printing, finishing and maintenance; a machine enclosure by itself is not a complete description of exposure control.[2]
Specialist processes
[edit | edit source]The following examples identify different manufacturing routes. They are not interchangeable material recommendations.
| Source case | What the provider must confirm | Route boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Massive Hemoptysis Simulator (New) | Exact airway geometry and version; the source's EOS TPU 1301 powder/SLS configuration; finishing and airway checks[3] | TPU powder is not a flexible-filament recipe. Follow the source/provider process. |
| Paediatric Airway Management Trainer (Carter) | Exact model data; Agilus30/PolyJet configuration; support removal and access to the airway[4] | Material jetting is distinct from vat-resin printing. A photopolymer label does not make a desktop-resin workflow applicable. |
These process identities are recorded on the simulator pages and in their primary sources. The Simulator model source register records whether the exact geometry and permissions have been verified. Do not treat a model-image or article supplement listing as a released STL set.
Produce and finish
[edit | edit source]Before production, agree what the quotation includes and which requirements it meets. Do not accept an unexplained substitution. If a manufacturer instruction and a simulator requirement conflict, record the conflict and obtain a resolution for that configuration.
For a vat-resin component, explicitly include the product-specific washing, drying, post-curing and support-removal sequence. Manufacturer finishing instructions differ by material and equipment; a completed printer cycle is not the complete job.[5]
For filament parts, specify required cooling, removal and permitted finishing. A clean-looking surface does not establish that internal structure or dimensions meet the source requirements.
Inspect and record
[edit | edit source]On receipt, compare component names, quantities and revision with the brief. Complete the required dimensional, opening and fit checks at the specified finished state. Confirm the actual material and relevant configuration from the provider's record. Record defects and deviations with photographs where useful.
Diagram description: A magnifying glass marks an edge of a generic component. The drawing gives an inspection cue; it does not show a passed check.
Keep parts with unresolved differences from the requirements separate from the training set. Resolve repair, replacement or acceptance with the responsible developer/reviewer. Retain the brief, actual build record and outcome so the next order can reproduce the same configuration.
Worked brief: the tibial fragments
[edit | edit source]This example shows how to prepare a useful brief while a requirement is unresolved. It is not a released production order.
- Simulator: Tibial Shaft Transverse Fracture Simulator.
- Components: one proximal Model 1 and one distal Model 2 from the specified Medical Makers file set.
- Files: Model_1_-_Male_-25-June-2022_version.stl (proximal fragment) and Model_2_-_Male_-19-May-2022_version.STL (distal fragment). Keep their distinct version dates.
- Source: developer print-preparation instructions. The source specifies white PLA and model-specific orientation and internal structure.
- Size question: the source lists Model 1 at 202.2127 mm and Model 2 at 202.2275 mm, but also gives 200 mm at 100% and a separate 95% S3 example.[6] Obtain one applicable target and scale instruction for the identified files; do not choose a value to fit the machine.
- Infill question: confirm the source-required pattern against the proposed printer/profile. Preserve the distinctions explained in the PLA filament printing guide.
- Licence record: the individual STL File pages explicitly declare CC BY-SA 4.0.[7] Retain those declarations and the upstream geometry provenance. The overview's displayed CERN-OHL-S value is inherited from the Device data template when its hardware-licence field is unset; it is not a separate explicit per-file licence declaration.[8]
- Release condition: resolve size, pattern compatibility and acceptance checks, retain the applicable attribution, then record the agreed provider configuration before production.
The numerical conflict belongs to this source file set. It is not a scaling rule for other bones or simulators.[9]
Troubleshooting
[edit | edit source]| Situation | Next action |
|---|---|
| Provider proposes a different material or process | Request the exact proposal and identify which requirement it changes; resolve before manufacture |
| Only some files are available | Identify missing parts and pause the affected order; do not replace them with a similarly named model |
| Returned part has no material or finishing record | Obtain the missing record before accepting it against the brief |
| Part fits but differs from the required internal structure | Treat this as a deviation; fit alone does not settle the component's training behaviour |
| Resin part arrives unfinished | Keep it within the agreed handling route and resolve the finishing responsibility before use |
Sources and related guidance
[edit | edit source]- ↑ Autodesk. 3D print a design. Model export and manufacturing preparation. Accessed 12 November 2026.
- ↑ NIOSH. Approaches to Safe 3D Printing. DHHS Publication 2024-103. Accessed 12 November 2026.
- ↑ Jacobson N, McClain H, New ML. Digital workflow for high-risk, low-volume procedure simulation. Journal of Biomed Research. 2023;4(1):1–7. DOI: 10.46439/biomedres.4.27. Method 2 and Results identify EOS P770 and EOS TPU 1301.
- ↑ Carter JC, Broadbent J, Murphy EC, et al. A three-dimensional (3D) printed paediatric trachea for airway management training. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2020;48(3). DOI: 10.1177/0310057X20925827.
- ↑ Formlabs. 3D printing post-processing FAQs. Accessed 12 November 2026.
- ↑ Medical Makers. 3D Printed Adult Male Tibial Bone Models, revision 1224271. The build-height sections and model-height figures preserve the source's conflicting scale statements.
- ↑ Medical Makers. Model 1 STL File page, revision 1114779; Model 2 STL File page, revision 679295. Both explicitly set CC-BY-SA-4.0 in File data.
- ↑ Appropedia. Template:Device data, revision 1176449, defaults the
hardware-licenseparameter to CERN-OHL-S. The inspected tibial overview, revision 1224271, invokes Device data without setting that parameter. - ↑ Medical Makers. Prepare 3D Print Files. Accessed 12 November 2026.
3D model preparation guide · Filament printing guide · Vat resin printing guide · 3D printing guides
| Authors | Arturo Pelayo |
|---|---|
| License | CC-BY-SA-4.0 |
| Cite as | Arturo Pelayo (2026). "TissueDB/Guides/Using a 3D printing service". Appropedia. Retrieved November 12, 2026. |

