This is an introductory text about the goal and scope of the literature review, for example, the parent page (in this case, SELF/Materials database) and the search keywords.
Search terms[edit | edit source]
- material alternatives database
- alternative materials database expert system
- alternative technologies output database
- alternative materials evaluation of environmental aspects
- materials database simulator fidelity body tissue
- surgical simulation tissue properties
- surgical simulation tissue material composite
Literature[edit | edit source]
This is an introductory text about the goal and scope of the literature review, for example, the parent page (in this case, SELF/Materials database) and the search keywords.
Material screening and choosing methods – A review[edit | edit source]
Source: (Jahan, Ismail, Sapuan et al., 2010)[1]
- Item type: Journal article
- Retrieved on: 2024-02-21
This article lists two relevant actions for material selection in engineering: screening and ranking.
- The article contains an interesting list of material characteristics: 1mechanical, physical, magnetic, electrical, thermal, surface, manufacturing-related, cost, reliability, durability, recycle ability, environmental impact, performance, availability, fashion, market trends, cultural, aesthetics, and user-interaction-related.
- Steps for material selection
- (Chiner): definition of design, analysis of material properties, screening of candidate materials, evaluation and optimal solution decision, verification
- (Farag): initial screening, developing and comparing alternatives, and selecting the optimum solution.
- Matching design requirements (Ashby et al.): translating necessities into requirements, screening out materials, ranking surviving materials and processes, searching supporting information about top-ranked candidates
- (Jalham): preselecting, selection, post-selection, techno-economic
- (Van Kesteren et al.): formulating material criteria, defining candidate materials, comparing candidate materials, choosing condidate materials.
- Screening methods
- Cost per unit: removing expensive materials
- Comparison chart
- Questionnaire method: classify materials into rigid (must have) and soft (with trade-offs) requirements
“The selection of the suitable material is a difficult process that demands the management of a great amount of information about the materials properties and there are often several solutions for a particular application.”
- Multi-criteria decision making: most used is TOPSIS (Technique of ranking Preferences by Similarity to the Ideal Solution)
- Optimization approaches
Java based expert system for selection of natural fibre composite materials[edit | edit source]
Source: (Ali, Sapuan, Zainudin et al., 2013)[2]
- Item type: Journal article
- Retrieved on: 2024-02-21
This article lists two relevant actions for material selection in engineering: screening and ranking.
- The article contains an interesting list of material characteristics: 1mechanical, physical, magnetic, electrical, thermal, surface, manufacturing-related, cost, reliability, durability, recycle ability, environmental impact, performance, availability, fashion, market trends, cultural, aesthetics, and user-interaction-related.
- Steps for material selection
- (Chiner): definition of design, analysis of material properties, screening of candidate materials, evaluation and optimal solution decision, verification
- (Farag): initial screening, developing and comparing alternatives, and selecting the optimum solution.
- Matching design requirements (Ashby et al.): translating necessities into requirements, screening out materials, ranking surviving materials and processes, searching supporting information about top-ranked candidates
- (Jalham): preselecting, selection, post-selection, techno-economic
- (Van Kesteren et al.): formulating material criteria, defining candidate materials, comparing candidate materials, choosing condidate materials.
- Screening methods
- Cost per unit: removing expensive materials
- Comparison chart
- Questionnaire method: classify materials into rigid (must have) and soft (with trade-offs) requirements
“The selection of the suitable material is a difficult process that demands the management of a great amount of information about the materials properties and there are often several solutions for a particular application.”
- Multi-criteria decision making: most used is TOPSIS (Technique of ranking Preferences by Similarity to the Ideal Solution)
- Optimization approaches
Expert System for Implant Material Selection[edit | edit source]
Source: (Risti, 2016)[3]
- Item type: Conference paper
- Retrieved on: 2024-02-21
This article lists two relevant actions for material selection in engineering: screening and ranking.
- The article contains an interesting list of material characteristics: 1mechanical, physical, magnetic, electrical, thermal, surface, manufacturing-related, cost, reliability, durability, recycle ability, environmental impact, performance, availability, fashion, market trends, cultural, aesthetics, and user-interaction-related.
- Steps for material selection
- (Chiner): definition of design, analysis of material properties, screening of candidate materials, evaluation and optimal solution decision, verification
- (Farag): initial screening, developing and comparing alternatives, and selecting the optimum solution.
- Matching design requirements (Ashby et al.): translating necessities into requirements, screening out materials, ranking surviving materials and processes, searching supporting information about top-ranked candidates
- (Jalham): preselecting, selection, post-selection, techno-economic
- (Van Kesteren et al.): formulating material criteria, defining candidate materials, comparing candidate materials, choosing condidate materials.
- Screening methods
- Cost per unit: removing expensive materials
- Comparison chart
- Questionnaire method: classify materials into rigid (must have) and soft (with trade-offs) requirements
“The selection of the suitable material is a difficult process that demands the management of a great amount of information about the materials properties and there are often several solutions for a particular application.”
- Multi-criteria decision making: most used is TOPSIS (Technique of ranking Preferences by Similarity to the Ideal Solution)
- Optimization approaches
An expert system based material selection approach to manufacturing[edit | edit source]
Source: (İpek, Selvi, Findik et al., 2013)[4]
- Item type: Journal article
- Retrieved on: 2024-02-22
This article lists two relevant actions for material selection in engineering: screening and ranking.
- The article contains an interesting list of material characteristics: 1mechanical, physical, magnetic, electrical, thermal, surface, manufacturing-related, cost, reliability, durability, recycle ability, environmental impact, performance, availability, fashion, market trends, cultural, aesthetics, and user-interaction-related.
- Steps for material selection
- (Chiner): definition of design, analysis of material properties, screening of candidate materials, evaluation and optimal solution decision, verification
- (Farag): initial screening, developing and comparing alternatives, and selecting the optimum solution.
- Matching design requirements (Ashby et al.): translating necessities into requirements, screening out materials, ranking surviving materials and processes, searching supporting information about top-ranked candidates
- (Jalham): preselecting, selection, post-selection, techno-economic
- (Van Kesteren et al.): formulating material criteria, defining candidate materials, comparing candidate materials, choosing condidate materials.
- Screening methods
- Cost per unit: removing expensive materials
- Comparison chart
- Questionnaire method: classify materials into rigid (must have) and soft (with trade-offs) requirements
“The selection of the suitable material is a difficult process that demands the management of a great amount of information about the materials properties and there are often several solutions for a particular application.”
- Multi-criteria decision making: most used is TOPSIS (Technique of ranking Preferences by Similarity to the Ideal Solution)
- Optimization approaches
A material selection methodology and expert system for sustainable product design[edit | edit source]
Source: (Zarandi, Mansour, Hosseinijou et al., 2011)[5]
- Item type: Journal article
- Retrieved on: 2024-02-22
This article lists two relevant actions for material selection in engineering: screening and ranking.
- The article contains an interesting list of material characteristics: 1mechanical, physical, magnetic, electrical, thermal, surface, manufacturing-related, cost, reliability, durability, recycle ability, environmental impact, performance, availability, fashion, market trends, cultural, aesthetics, and user-interaction-related.
- Steps for material selection
- (Chiner): definition of design, analysis of material properties, screening of candidate materials, evaluation and optimal solution decision, verification
- (Farag): initial screening, developing and comparing alternatives, and selecting the optimum solution.
- Matching design requirements (Ashby et al.): translating necessities into requirements, screening out materials, ranking surviving materials and processes, searching supporting information about top-ranked candidates
- (Jalham): preselecting, selection, post-selection, techno-economic
- (Van Kesteren et al.): formulating material criteria, defining candidate materials, comparing candidate materials, choosing condidate materials.
- Screening methods
- Cost per unit: removing expensive materials
- Comparison chart
- Questionnaire method: classify materials into rigid (must have) and soft (with trade-offs) requirements
“The selection of the suitable material is a difficult process that demands the management of a great amount of information about the materials properties and there are often several solutions for a particular application.”
- Multi-criteria decision making: most used is TOPSIS (Technique of ranking Preferences by Similarity to the Ideal Solution)
- Optimization approaches
Web-based material data knowledge base and expert system[edit | edit source]
Source: (Basan, Franulović, and Križan, 2011)[6]
- Item type: Conference paper
- Retrieved on: 2024-02-22
This article lists two relevant actions for material selection in engineering: screening and ranking.
- The article contains an interesting list of material characteristics: 1mechanical, physical, magnetic, electrical, thermal, surface, manufacturing-related, cost, reliability, durability, recycle ability, environmental impact, performance, availability, fashion, market trends, cultural, aesthetics, and user-interaction-related.
- Steps for material selection
- (Chiner): definition of design, analysis of material properties, screening of candidate materials, evaluation and optimal solution decision, verification
- (Farag): initial screening, developing and comparing alternatives, and selecting the optimum solution.
- Matching design requirements (Ashby et al.): translating necessities into requirements, screening out materials, ranking surviving materials and processes, searching supporting information about top-ranked candidates
- (Jalham): preselecting, selection, post-selection, techno-economic
- (Van Kesteren et al.): formulating material criteria, defining candidate materials, comparing candidate materials, choosing condidate materials.
- Screening methods
- Cost per unit: removing expensive materials
- Comparison chart
- Questionnaire method: classify materials into rigid (must have) and soft (with trade-offs) requirements
“The selection of the suitable material is a difficult process that demands the management of a great amount of information about the materials properties and there are often several solutions for a particular application.”
- Multi-criteria decision making: most used is TOPSIS (Technique of ranking Preferences by Similarity to the Ideal Solution)
- Optimization approaches
High-Fidelity Physical Organ Simulators: From Artificial to Bio-Hybrid Solutions | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore[edit | edit source]
Source: (, 2024)[7]
- Item type: Web page
- Retrieved on: 2024-02-22
This article lists two relevant actions for material selection in engineering: screening and ranking.
- The article contains an interesting list of material characteristics: 1mechanical, physical, magnetic, electrical, thermal, surface, manufacturing-related, cost, reliability, durability, recycle ability, environmental impact, performance, availability, fashion, market trends, cultural, aesthetics, and user-interaction-related.
- Steps for material selection
- (Chiner): definition of design, analysis of material properties, screening of candidate materials, evaluation and optimal solution decision, verification
- (Farag): initial screening, developing and comparing alternatives, and selecting the optimum solution.
- Matching design requirements (Ashby et al.): translating necessities into requirements, screening out materials, ranking surviving materials and processes, searching supporting information about top-ranked candidates
- (Jalham): preselecting, selection, post-selection, techno-economic
- (Van Kesteren et al.): formulating material criteria, defining candidate materials, comparing candidate materials, choosing condidate materials.
- Screening methods
- Cost per unit: removing expensive materials
- Comparison chart
- Questionnaire method: classify materials into rigid (must have) and soft (with trade-offs) requirements
“The selection of the suitable material is a difficult process that demands the management of a great amount of information about the materials properties and there are often several solutions for a particular application.”
- Multi-criteria decision making: most used is TOPSIS (Technique of ranking Preferences by Similarity to the Ideal Solution)
- Optimization approaches
Soft Tissue Modeling for Surgery Simulation[edit | edit source]
Source: (Delingette and Ayache, 2004)[8]
- Item type: Book section
- Retrieved on: 2024-02-22
This article lists two relevant actions for material selection in engineering: screening and ranking.
- The article contains an interesting list of material characteristics: 1mechanical, physical, magnetic, electrical, thermal, surface, manufacturing-related, cost, reliability, durability, recycle ability, environmental impact, performance, availability, fashion, market trends, cultural, aesthetics, and user-interaction-related.
- Steps for material selection
- (Chiner): definition of design, analysis of material properties, screening of candidate materials, evaluation and optimal solution decision, verification
- (Farag): initial screening, developing and comparing alternatives, and selecting the optimum solution.
- Matching design requirements (Ashby et al.): translating necessities into requirements, screening out materials, ranking surviving materials and processes, searching supporting information about top-ranked candidates
- (Jalham): preselecting, selection, post-selection, techno-economic
- (Van Kesteren et al.): formulating material criteria, defining candidate materials, comparing candidate materials, choosing condidate materials.
- Screening methods
- Cost per unit: removing expensive materials
- Comparison chart
- Questionnaire method: classify materials into rigid (must have) and soft (with trade-offs) requirements
“The selection of the suitable material is a difficult process that demands the management of a great amount of information about the materials properties and there are often several solutions for a particular application.”
- Multi-criteria decision making: most used is TOPSIS (Technique of ranking Preferences by Similarity to the Ideal Solution)
- Optimization approaches
Simulated Human Tissue Performance[edit | edit source]
Source: (Norfleet, Fenoglietto, and Mazzeo, 2015)[9]
- Item type: Conference paper
- Retrieved on: 2024-02-22
This article lists two relevant actions for material selection in engineering: screening and ranking.
- The article contains an interesting list of material characteristics: 1mechanical, physical, magnetic, electrical, thermal, surface, manufacturing-related, cost, reliability, durability, recycle ability, environmental impact, performance, availability, fashion, market trends, cultural, aesthetics, and user-interaction-related.
- Steps for material selection
- (Chiner): definition of design, analysis of material properties, screening of candidate materials, evaluation and optimal solution decision, verification
- (Farag): initial screening, developing and comparing alternatives, and selecting the optimum solution.
- Matching design requirements (Ashby et al.): translating necessities into requirements, screening out materials, ranking surviving materials and processes, searching supporting information about top-ranked candidates
- (Jalham): preselecting, selection, post-selection, techno-economic
- (Van Kesteren et al.): formulating material criteria, defining candidate materials, comparing candidate materials, choosing condidate materials.
- Screening methods
- Cost per unit: removing expensive materials
- Comparison chart
- Questionnaire method: classify materials into rigid (must have) and soft (with trade-offs) requirements
“The selection of the suitable material is a difficult process that demands the management of a great amount of information about the materials properties and there are often several solutions for a particular application.”
- Multi-criteria decision making: most used is TOPSIS (Technique of ranking Preferences by Similarity to the Ideal Solution)
- Optimization approaches
Composite Bone Models in Orthopaedic Surgery Research and Education[edit | edit source]
Source: (Elfar, Menorca, Reed et al., 2014)[10]
- Item type: Journal article
- Retrieved on: 2024-02-22
This article lists two relevant actions for material selection in engineering: screening and ranking.
- The article contains an interesting list of material characteristics: 1mechanical, physical, magnetic, electrical, thermal, surface, manufacturing-related, cost, reliability, durability, recycle ability, environmental impact, performance, availability, fashion, market trends, cultural, aesthetics, and user-interaction-related.
- Steps for material selection
- (Chiner): definition of design, analysis of material properties, screening of candidate materials, evaluation and optimal solution decision, verification
- (Farag): initial screening, developing and comparing alternatives, and selecting the optimum solution.
- Matching design requirements (Ashby et al.): translating necessities into requirements, screening out materials, ranking surviving materials and processes, searching supporting information about top-ranked candidates
- (Jalham): preselecting, selection, post-selection, techno-economic
- (Van Kesteren et al.): formulating material criteria, defining candidate materials, comparing candidate materials, choosing condidate materials.
- Screening methods
- Cost per unit: removing expensive materials
- Comparison chart
- Questionnaire method: classify materials into rigid (must have) and soft (with trade-offs) requirements
“The selection of the suitable material is a difficult process that demands the management of a great amount of information about the materials properties and there are often several solutions for a particular application.”
- Multi-criteria decision making: most used is TOPSIS (Technique of ranking Preferences by Similarity to the Ideal Solution)
- Optimization approaches
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Jahan A, Ismail MY, Sapuan SM, Mustapha F (2010). “Material screening and choosing methods – A review.” Materials \&Design, 31(2), 696-705. ISSN 0261-3069, doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.013 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.013>,<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261306909004361>.
- ↑ Ali BAA, Sapuan SM, Zainudin ES, Othman M (2013). “Java based expert system for selection of natural fibre compositematerials.” Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment.
- ↑ Risti M (2016). “Expert System for Implant Material Selection.” In ICIST 2016. ISBN 978-86-85525-18-6.
- ↑ İpek M, Selvi İH, Findik F, Torkul O, Cedimoğlu IH (2013). “An expert system based material selection approach tomanufacturing.” Materials \& Design, 47, 331-340. ISSN 0261-3069, doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.060<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.060>, <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261306912008187>.
- ↑ Zarandi MHF, Mansour S, Hosseinijou SA, Avazbeigi M (2011). “A material selection methodology and expert system forsustainable product design.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 57(9), 885-903. ISSN1433-3015, doi:10.1007/s00170-011-3362-y <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3362-y>,<https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3362-y>.
- ↑ Basan R, Franulović M, Križan B (2011). “Web-based material data knowledge base and expert system.” In In15th InternationalResearch/Expert Conference" Trends in the development of machinery and associated technology"-TMT, volume 2011.<https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=16a3b926c063fcbf3e1bfa8aadfbee72fe159b3d>.
- ↑ (????). “High-Fidelity Physical Organ Simulators: From Artificial to Bio-Hybrid Solutions \textbar IEEE Journals \& Magazine\textbar IEEE Xplore.” <https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9369372>.
- ↑ Delingette H, Ayache N (2004). “Soft Tissue Modeling for Surgery Simulation.” In Handbook of Numerical Analysis, volume 12series Computational Models for the Human Body, 453-550. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S1570-8659(03)12005-4<https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-8659%2803%2912005-4>, <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570865903120054>.
- ↑ Norfleet J, Fenoglietto FL, Mazzeo M (2015). “Simulated Human Tissue Performance.” In MODSIM World 2015.
- ↑ Elfar JJ, Menorca RMG, Reed JD, Stanbury S (2014). “Composite Bone Models in Orthopaedic Surgery Research and Education.”JAAOS - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 22(2), 111. ISSN 1067-151X, doi:10.5435/JAAOS-22-02-111<https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-22-02-111>,<https://journals.lww.com/jaaos/abstract/2014/02000/compositebonemodelsinorthopaedicsurgery.6.aspx>.
TRIZ[edit | edit source]
Sheng, I. L. S.; Kok-Soo, T. (2010). "Eco-Efficient Product Design Using theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) Principles". American Journal of Applied Sciences. 7 (6): 852–858. doi:10.3844/ajassp.2010.852.858
Vidal, Rosario; Salmeron, Jose L.; Mena, Angel; Chulvi, Vicente (2015). "Fuzzy Cognitive Map-based selection of TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) trends for eco-innovation of ceramic industry products". Journal of Cleaner Production. 107: 202–214. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.131. hdl:10234/159616
Russo D, Spreafico C. TRIZ-Based Guidelines for Eco-Improvement. Sustainability. 2020; 12(8):3412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083412
Delgado-Maciel, J., Cortés-Robles, G., Sánchez-Ramírez, C., García-Alcaraz, J., & Méndez-Contreras, J. M. (2020). The evaluation of conceptual design through dynamic simulation: A proposal based on TRIZ and system Dynamics. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 149, 106785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106785
Simulator materials by tissue type[edit | edit source]
Bone[edit | edit source]
- Rose, A. S., Kimbell, J. S., Webster, C. E., Harrysson, O. L. A., Formeister, E. J., & Buchman, C. A. (2015). Multi-material 3D Models for Temporal Bone Surgical Simulation. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 124(7), 528–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489415570937
- Haïat, G., Padilla, F., Peyrin, F., & Laugier, P. (2007). Variation of Ultrasonic Parameters With Microstructure and Material Properties of Trabecular Bone: A 3D Model Simulation. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 22(5), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.070209
