Hexayurt project/Military: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:35, 12 August 2008

Why are the military interested in Hexayurts?

The short answer is that the military is always looking for new ways to solve problems.

The long answer is more complicated.

The Long Answer

The role of the military changes over time. Things are changing at the Pentagon. In 2005, Gordon England signed 3000.05 which says that the military has to develop really advanced capabilities in fixing things up, and that they should get about as good at fixing things as they currently are at breaking them. To be more precise, it says:

Stability operations are a core U.S. military mission that the Department of Defense shall be prepared to conduct and support. [Stability operations] shall be given priority comparable to combat operations and be explicitly addressed and integrated across all DoD activities including doctrine, organizations, training, education, exercises, materiel, leadership, personnel, facilities, and planning.

Stability operations are conducted to help establish order that advances U.S. interests and values. The immediate goal often is to provide the local populace with security, restore essential services, and meet humanitarian needs. The long-term goal is to help develop indigenous capacity for securing essential services, a viable market economy, rule of law, democratic institutions, and a robust civil society. (emphasis added)

This is a mandate for military-funded development of appropriate technology resources. Nothing else is even close to fulfilling this requirement.

I believe what's going to come out of this directive in the long run is high quality solutions for shelter, for housing in general, for power, for water, for lighting, for cooking, and for every needful thing.

I built Hexayurts at the Strong Angel III demonstration in San Diego, CA, and Combined Endeavor 2007 in Germany. I also presented on them to a group of senior logistics officers at the Pentagon, and work with the "Expedient Infrastructure for Transitory Populations" project. Buckminster Fuller worked extensively with the Department of Defense for many, many years, and I hope that I am helping keep his ideas alive for the current generation of the military.

--Vinay Gupta 08:40, 2 August 2007 (PDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{:Hexayurt Project Header}}
+{{Hexayurt header}}
-Why are the military interested in Hexayurts?
+== Why are the military interested in Hexayurts? ==
 The short answer is that the military is always looking for new ways to solve problems.
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 The long answer is more complicated.
-Firstly, the role of the military changes over time. The basic job might be pretty well understood, but very little of the complexity of the military can be explained by the simple need to fight and win wars.
+=== The Long Answer ===
-No, the truth is that the military is the last resort. Right now, if something '''totally''' out of hand happened, like aliens or a giant meteor or a Godzilla attack, the military are the people who get the call. It's their job to protect against the unexpected, against all threats both known and unknown, and to - if necessary - give their lives for that purpose.
+The role of the military changes over time. Things are changing at the Pentagon. In 2005, [http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/biographydetail.aspx?biographyid=47 Gordon England] signed [http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/300005p.pdf 3000.05] which says that the military has to develop really advanced capabilities in fixing things up, and that they should get about as good at fixing things as they currently are at breaking them. To be more precise, it says:
-Part of what goes along with that is obedience to political authority. For all of the various opinions (and I'm keeping my mouth shut here) that we might have about the policy of the current administration, we would have a much, much worse problem if the military simply refused to follow the orders of the President. That's how countries wind up with a General in charge, rather than a civilian-managed government.
+''Stability operations are a core U.S. military mission that the Department of Defense shall be prepared to conduct and support.  '''[Stability operations] shall be given priority comparable to combat operations''' and be explicitly addressed and integrated across all DoD activities including doctrine, organizations, training, education, exercises, materiel, leadership, personnel, facilities, and planning.''
-You're reading this page over the Internet. The Internet spun off from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET ARPANET]. Why did the military build ARPANET? Well, at the time, it didn't have direct applications. It was a capability that might be useful in the future.
+''Stability operations are conducted to help establish order that advances U.S. interests and values.  The immediate goal often is to provide the local populace with security, '''restore essential services, and meet humanitarian needs.  The long-term goal is to help develop indigenous capacity for securing essential services''', a viable market economy, rule of law, democratic institutions, and a robust civil society. '' (emphasis added)
-It sure is.
+This is a mandate for military-funded development of [[appropriate technology]] resources. Nothing else is even close to fulfilling this requirement.
-The military have taken very good care of me and this project for quite a while. They did that because it might come in useful, but also because they are human beings trying to do the right thing, and to use - but not ''abuse'' - their enormous power to make the world a better place.
+I believe what's going to come out of this directive in the long run is high quality solutions for shelter, for housing in general, for power, for water, for lighting, for cooking, and for every needful thing.
-Things are changing at the Pentagon. In 2005, [http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/biographydetail.aspx?biographyid=47 Gordon England] signed [http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/300005p.pdf 3000.05] which says that the military has to develop really advanced capabilities in fixing things up, and that they should get about as good at fixing things as they current are at breaking them. To be more precise, it says:
+I built Hexayurts at the Strong Angel III demonstration in San Diego, CA, and Combined Endeavor 2007 in Germany. I also presented on them to a group of senior logistics officers at the Pentagon, and work with the "Expedient Infrastructure for Transitory Populations" project. Buckminster Fuller worked extensively with the Department of Defense for many, many years, and I hope that I am helping keep his ideas alive for the current generation of the military.
-''Stability operations are a core U.S. military mission that the Department of Defense
+--[[User:Vinay Gupta|Vinay Gupta]] 08:40, 2 August 2007 (PDT)
-shall be prepared to conduct and support.  They shall be given priority '''comparable to combat
-operations''' and be explicitly addressed and integrated across all DoD activities including
-doctrine, organizations, training, education, exercises, materiel, leadership, personnel, facilities,
-and planning.''
-So within that mandate, there's a whole new generation of research and thinking about '''how to take care of people''' as if it was as important as, er, being very good at blowing them up.
+[[Category:Hexayurt project]]
-'''What's going to come out of that in the long run, I believe, is Internet-class solutions for housing, for shelter in general, for power, for water, for lighting, for cooking, and for every needful thing.'''
-The Hexayurt is a little start. It's part of a much wider picture of development. So don't knock these guys. They brought you the internet, and they're doing the best they can.