Wonthaggi desalination plant site
Font Awesome map marker.svg Angle down icon.svg Location data
Loading map...
Location Victoria, Australia

Plans to build a desalination plant at Wonthaggi in Victoria, Australia, were announced by the Bracks Labor government in June 2007.[1]

Information about the plant[edit | edit source]

  • Household water bills are expected to double over the next five years to pay for a $4.9 billion water strategy to secure Melbourne's water supplies.
  • Estimated water production is 150 billion litres (150 gigalitres) of fresh water per year, approximately a third of metropolitan Melbourne's needs based on 2007 consumption levels.
  • The plant is planned to be operations by the end of 2011.
  • It is intended that the plant will provide additional water to Melbourne, Geelong, Western Port and South Gippsland.
  • The plant is estimated to use about 90 mega watts (MW) of power from the grid, which translates to 2160MWh per day. While a commitment was made to use renewable energy to power the plant in an attempt to make it greenhouse neutral, it is likely the plant will be partly powered by a new co-located gas fired power station or from power from the grid from coal-fired power stations, both of which will produce significant greenhouse gas emissions.
  • The plant is expected to emit 200 million tonnes of brine to the ocean.
  • The plant will be constructed using a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) and could end up being foreign owned.
  • The Bracks government opposed the construction of a desalination plant during the 2006 Victorian State election, but reversed its position after the election and committed to building it.
  • There was no proper public consultation process that provided input to inform the Government decision to build the plant.
  • Significant energy (with associated greenhouse gas emissions) will be required to pump desalinated water from Wonthaggi to Melbourne.
  • More than 1.4 million tonnes of greenhouse gas will be pumped out during the construction of Victoria's proposed desalination plant, and another 1.2 million tonnes emitted each year once it starts boosting Melbourne's water supply.
  • Greenhouse emissions during the construction of the plant, and about 70,000 tonnes from waste decomposition and transport during its operation, will not be offset.
  • Using a two-headed marine structure extending up to two kilometres offshore, the plant will take in 480 billion litres of seawater and pump back 280 billion litres of saline concentration each year.[2]

Controversy about the location[edit | edit source]

Floodwater has again threatened the South Gippsland site of proposed desalination plant. Flooding of the site in 2007 was called a "one-in-100-year" event by the State Government, but water from the Powlett River has flowed again over land set aside near Wonthaggi.[3]

Power consumption comparison with domestic water tanks[edit | edit source]

The proposed plant is estimated to need between 90 and 120 MW of electricity to operate.

Comparing the energy consumption of the plant with that required for domestic water tank pumps:

  • Domestic water tanks are capable of supplying over 95 per cent of the water for a house in Melbourne.
  • 600,000 households could save up to 160 gigalitres of water per year by using captured rainwater and reducing their daily consumption.
  • The energy required for domestic water tank pumps would multiply to 140 MWh of energy per day for these same households.
  • The proposed desalination plant would consume 15 times as much energy just to operate. More energy would be required to pump the water it produces to Melbourne.

Costs[edit | edit source]

  • The construction cost is estimated to be $3 billion
  • Operating costs (most likely charged by a private firm) over a 25 year period could reach $1.5 billion[4]
  • Melbourne Water estimates the cost of production of desal water to be $3000 a megalitre

It has been reported that water bills for Melbourne households will almost double over the next five years. Water price plans released by the Essential Services Commission show metropolitan water providers will charge between 87 per cent and 96 per cent more for water. Water Minister Tim Holding, has stated that Melbourne residents need to help pay for major water infrastructure projects, such as the desalination plant and the Sugarloaf (North South) pipeline.[5]

Unfortunately, the community will be forced to pay for the desalination plant, whether they want it or not, without any consultation or serious consideration of alternatives such as domestic water tanks.

Alternatives[edit | edit source]

  • The capital cost of the plant would could equip about 600,000 households with tank systems and pumps (at $5000 per house) that could provide more water than the plant's estimated production. Combined with recycling sewerage water and protecting our catchments, we may not even need desalination. This option would require about 140 MWh of energy per day, while the desalination plant would consume 15 times as much energy just to operate (2160 MWh per day).
  • Stopping logging in Melbourne's water catchments would provide an extra 30 gigalitres of water, which would be much cheaper than paying for the same amount of water to be provided by desalination. This water would also not require pumping to Melbourne.
  • A 2007 study of using rainwater tanks as a viable urban water solution concluded that:
"Rainwater tanks are five times more energy efficient than desalination plants and twice as energy efficient as the proposed Traveston dam, per megalitre of water produced.

"If governments deployed rainwater tanks to 5 per cent of households each year in Sydney and South-East Queensland, dams and desalination plants planned for 2010 could be delayed past 2026 (Sydney) and 2019 (SEQ).
"Most Australian houses are suitable for a rainwater tank. In Sydney 65 per cent (or 1.1 million houses), in SEQ 73 per cent (or 900 000 houses) and in Melbourne 72 per cent of existing houses have potential for a rainwater tank.
"While 38 per cent of households in Adelaide have rainwater tanks, fewer than 6 per cent of the houses in Melbourne, Sydney, South-East Queensland and Perth do," said ACF's urban water campaigner Kate Noble.
"Rainwater tanks collect and store water far more efficiently than dams, especially in times of drought. As the climate changes we should be installing tanks to take advantage of the rain that does fall on our rooftops.
"If governments systematically installed rainwater tanks in Australia's major cities, we would secure as much water as the planned Kurnell desalination plant in Sydney, the Tugan desalination plant on the Gold Coast and the stage one of the unpopular Traveston Dam proposed for Queensland's Mary River," Ms Noble said.

Video[edit | edit source]


See also[edit | edit source]

External links[edit | edit source]

"We are staring down the barrel of running out of water," says Priestley. Rainwater tanks, groundwater, stormwater, desalination, recycling, new dams, more efficiencies all need to be on the table - "each city has to look at all options, not put a red line through any of them, including recycling."

References[edit | edit source]

FA info icon.svg Angle down icon.svg Page data
Keywords desalination, politics, desalination plant
SDG SDG06 Clean water and sanitation, SDG11 Sustainable cities and communities
Authors Peter Campbell
License CC-BY-SA-3.0
Organizations Green living wiki
Ported from http://www.greenlivingpedia.org/Victorian_desalination_plant (original)
Language English (en)
Related 0 subpages, 2 pages link here
Impact 398 page views
Created March 7, 2008 by Peter Campbell
Modified February 28, 2024 by Felipe Schenone
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.