Jump to content

Using Zotero to create literature reviews/Example

From Appropedia

This literature review was created automatically from a list of references and notes in Zotero (see this page for more information).

Literature

[edit | edit source]

Transición energética: detrás de la tensión entre ambiente y economía - Por Juan Ignacio Arroyo

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Arroyo, 2021)[1]

Notes

[edit | edit source]
  • This is an example of a note in Zotero.
  • Here is a second item in this note.

Is 3D Printing A Clean Technology?

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Sensiba, 2021)[2]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Solar Radiation Management Through an Ethical Lens: Exploring Moral Permissibility of Climate Change Mitigation Through the Doctrines of Double Effect and Doing and Allowing

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Holstein, 2015)[3]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

The Pressing Need for Alternative Technology

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Clarke, 1973)[4]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Report: Fog of Enactment

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Roussilhe, 2021)[5]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

“Lean ICT: Towards digital sobriety”: Our new report on the environmental impact of ICT

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Ferreboeuf, 2019)[6]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Is Big Tech the new power player in renewable energy? - ESG Sustainable Views

[edit | edit source]
Source: (O’Farrell, 2021)[7]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Informes Digitalización y cambio climático

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Ordiales, 2021)[8]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

The cyber-consciousness of environmental assessment: how environmental assessments evaluate the impacts of smart, connected, and digital technology

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Mulrow, Gali, and Grubert, 2021)[9]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

The Promise of AI: Can It Hold for Environmental Sustainability?

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Berger, 2021)[10]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Terraforming: Feminism and Technology in the Design of the Anthropocene.

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Terraformación, 2021)[11]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Tackling climate change with machine learning

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Rolnick, Donti, Kaack et al., 2019)[12]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Rethinking the status of water in digital technologies

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Terraformación, 2022)[13]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Remote work risks exploiting workers in low-income countries

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Iyer, 2021)[14]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Midstream and sideways: Considering a middle-out approach to changing energy demand

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Parag and Janda, 2010)[15]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

The tech workforce is expanding—and changing—as different sectors battle for talent

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Barua, 2022)[16]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Middle-out design: collaborative community engagement in urban HCI

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Fredericks, Caldwell, and Tomitsch, 2016)[17]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

More than filler: Middle actors and socio-technical change in the energy system from the “middle-out”

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Parag and Janda, 2014)[18]

Notes

[edit | edit source]
[edit | edit source]
Source: (Cole, 2020)[19]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Self-Confrontation via a Carbon Footprint Calculator Increases Guilt and Support for a Proenvironmental Group

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Mallett, Melchiori, and Strickroth, 2013)[20]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

The role of outsourcing in driving global carbon emissions

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Malik and Lan, 2016)[21]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Restor(y)ing the Ground: Digital Environmental Media Studies

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Gould, 2016)[22]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Life cycle inventory and carbon footprint assessment of wireless ICT networks for six demographic areas

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Ruiz, San Miguel, Rojo et al., 2022)[23]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Sustainability transition and economic growth enigma: Money or energy?

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Ayres, Campbell, Casten et al., 2013)[24]

Notes

[edit | edit source]
  • This is another example of a note.

Thermodynamics and Money

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Huber, 2005)[25]

Notes

[edit | edit source]
[edit | edit source]
Source: (Fisher, 2001)[26]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Os Contornos Da Sociedade Da Informação: Entre Informação, Tecnologia E Poder-Tecnología, sociedad y educación: desafíos de las Tic en el desarrollo social y sus implicaciones en la práctica educativa

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Villota Enríquez and Ogécime, 2019)[27]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Renewables Readiness Assessment: El Salvador

[edit | edit source]
Source: (IRENA, 2020)[28]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Is't Virtual Insanity about how much the digital future sucks?

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Emilio Velis [@emilio], 2022)[29]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

The Materiality of Digital Culture

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Sacasas, 2021)[30]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

Towards a philosophy of photography

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Flusser, 2013)[31]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

The Economics of Permanence

[edit | edit source]
Source: (Schumacher, 1972)[32]

Notes

[edit | edit source]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. Arroyo JI (2021). “Transición energética: detrás de la tensión entre ambiente y economía - Por Juan Ignacio Arroyo.”<https://www.nodal.am/2021/06/transicion-energetica-detras-de-la-tension-entre-ambiente-y-economia-por-juan-ignacio-arroyo/>.
  2. Sensiba J (2021). “Is 3D Printing A Clean Technology?” Running Time: 60,<https://cleantechnica.com/2021/01/25/is-3d-printing-a-clean-technology/>.
  3. Holstein D (2015). Solar Radiation Management Through an Ethical Lens: Exploring Moral Permissibility of ClimateChange Mitigation Through the Doctrines of Double Effect and Doing and Allowing. Thesis, University of Washington.Accepted: 2016-03-11T22:41:00Z, <https://digital.lib.washington.edu:443/researchworks/handle/1773/35236>.
  4. Clarke R (1973). “The Pressing Need for Alternative Technology.” Impact of science on society, 23(4), 257-271.Publisher: ERIC.
  5. Roussilhe G (2021). “Report: Fog of Enactment.” The Green Web Foundation.<https://www.thegreenwebfoundation.org/publications/report-fog-of-enactment/>.
  6. Ferreboeuf H (2019). ““Lean ICT: Towards digital sobriety”: Our new report on the environmental impact of ICT.”<https://theshiftproject.org/en/article/lean-ict-our-new-report/>.
  7. O’Farrell S (2021). “Is Big Tech the new power player in renewable energy? - ESG Sustainable Views.”<https://www.esg-specialist.com/is-big-tech-the-new-power-player-in-renewable-energy/>.
  8. Ordiales I (2021). “Informes Digitalización y cambio climático.” Fundación Alternativas.<https://www.fundacionalternativas.org/las-publicaciones/informes/digitalizacion-y-cambio-climatico>.
  9. Mulrow J, Gali M, Grubert E (2021). “The cyber-consciousness of environmental assessment: how environmentalassessments evaluate the impacts of smart, connected, and digital technology.” Environmental Research Letters,17(1), 013001. ISSN 1748-9326, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac413b <https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac413b>, Publisher:IOP Publishing, <https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac413b>.
  10. Berger C (2021). “The Promise of AI: Can It Hold for Environmental Sustainability?”<https://branch.climateaction.tech/issues/issue-2/the-promise-of-ai-can-it-hold-for-environmental-sustainability/>.
  11. Terraformación ILd (2021). “Terraforming: Feminism and Technology in the Design of the Anthropocene.”<https://terraforminglatam.net/chapeter-1-feminism-and-technology-in-the-design-of-the-anthropocene>.
  12. Rolnick D, Donti PL, Kaack LH, Kochanski K, Lacoste A, Sankaran K, Ross AS, Milojevic-Dupont N, Jaques N,Waldman-Brown A, others (2019). “Tackling climate change with machine learning.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05433.
  13. Terraformación ILd (2022). “Rethinking the status of water in digital technologies.”<https://terraforminglatam.net/rethinking-the-status-of-water-in-digital-technologies>.
  14. Iyer N (2021). “Remote work risks exploiting workers in low-income countries.”<https://qz.com/africa/2053741/remote-work-risks-exploiting-workers-in-low-income-countries/>.
  15. Parag Y, Janda KB (2010). “Midstream and sideways: Considering a middle-out approach to changing energy demand.”Proceedings of Energy Transitions in an Interdependent World.
  16. Barua A (????). “The tech workforce is expanding—and changing—as different sectors battle for talent.”<https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/economy/spotlight/tech-workforce-expanding.html>.
  17. Fredericks J, Caldwell GA, Tomitsch M (2016). “Middle-out design: collaborative community engagement in urban HCI.” InProceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, series OzCHI '16, 200-204. ISBN978-1-4503-4618-4, doi:10.1145/3010915.3010997 <https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010997>,<https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010997>.
  18. Parag Y, Janda KB (2014). “More than filler: Middle actors and socio-technical change in the energy system from the“middle-out”.” Energy Research \& Social Science, 3, 102-112. ISSN 2214-6296, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.011<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.011>, <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629614000899>.
  19. Cole RJ (2020). “Navigating Climate Change: Rethinking the Role of Buildings.” Sustainability, 12(22), 9527. ISSN2071-1050, doi:10.3390/su12229527 <https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229527>, Number: 22 Publisher: MultidisciplinaryDigital Publishing Institute, <https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9527>.
  20. Mallett RK, Melchiori KJ, Strickroth T (2013). “Self-Confrontation via a Carbon Footprint Calculator Increases Guiltand Support for a Proenvironmental Group.” Ecopsychology, 5(1), 9-16. doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0067<https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2012.0067>, Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers,<https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/eco.2012.0067>.
  21. Malik A, Lan J (2016). “The role of outsourcing in driving global carbon emissions.” Economic Systems Research,28(2), 168-182. ISSN 0953-5314, doi:10.1080/09535314.2016.1172475 <https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2016.1172475>,Publisher: Routledge \ eprint: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09535314.2016.1172475,<https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09535314.2016.1172475>.
  22. Gould AS (2016). “Restor(y)ing the Ground: Digital Environmental Media Studies.” Networking Knowledge: Journal of theMeCCSA Postgraduate Network, 9(5). ISSN 1755-9944, doi:10.31165/nk.2016.95.455<https://doi.org/10.31165/nk.2016.95.455>, Number: 5, <https://ojs.meccsa.org.uk/index.php/netknow/article/view/455>.
  23. Ruiz D, San Miguel G, Rojo J, Teriús-Padrón JG, Gaeta E, Arredondo MT, Hernández JF, Pérez J (2022). “Life cycleinventory and carbon footprint assessment of wireless ICT networks for six demographic areas.” Resources,Conservation and Recycling, 176, 105951. ISSN 0921-3449, doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105951<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105951>,<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344921005607>.
  24. Ayres RU, Campbell CJ, Casten TR, Horne PJ, Kümmel R, Laitner JA, Schulte UG, van den Bergh JCJM, von Weiszäcker EU(2013). “Sustainability transition and economic growth enigma: Money or energy?” Environmental Innovation andSocietal Transitions, 9, 8-12. ISSN 2210-4224, doi:10.1016/j.eist.2013.09.002<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.09.002>, <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422413000622>.
  25. Huber P (2005). “Thermodynamics and Money.” <https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2005/1031/122.html>.
  26. Fisher W (2001). “Theories of intellectual property: New essays in the legal and political theory of property.” newessays in the legal and political theory of property. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  27. Villota Enríquez JA, Ogécime M (2019). “Os Contornos Da Sociedade Da Informação: Entre Informação, Tecnologia EPoder-Tecnología, sociedad y educación: desafíos de las Tic en el desarrollo social y sus implicaciones en la prácticaeducativa.” In Tecnología, sociedad y educación. Editorial Universidad Santiago de Cali.
  28. IRENA (2020). “Renewables Readiness Assessment: El Salvador.” International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi.
  29. Emilio Velis [@emilio] (2022). “Is't Virtual Insanity about how much the digital future sucks?” <https://twitter.com/emilio/status/1527632202221199361>.
  30. Sacasas LM (2021). “The Materiality of Digital Culture.”<The%20Materiality%20of%20Digital%20Culture%20It's%20not%20as%20invisible%E2%80%94or%20as%20disembodying%E2%80%94as%20our%20devices%20lead%20us%20to%20believe.>.
  31. Flusser V (2013). Towards a philosophy of photography. Reaktion Books.
  32. Schumacher EF (1972). “The Economics of Permanence.” Undercurrents, 49-54.<https://undercurrents1972.wordpress.com/2015/01/23/uc01-1972/>.
Page data
Keywords programming, literature reviews
SDG
Authors Emilio
License CC-BY-SA-4.0
Language English (en)
Translations Spanish
Related 1 subpages, 1 pages link here
Views 107 page views (analytics)
Created February 28, 2023 by Emilio
Last edit January 24, 2025 by StandardWikitext bot
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.