User:Arturopelayo/TissueDB 3D printing series review 2026-11-11

Published guide set — 12 November 2026. The expanded series is available at the canonical pages below. The table uses the current guide names. The original review record follows this status update.

Development review — 11 November 2026. This is the coordinated TissueDB 3D printing guide set developed after acceptance of the series plan. It brings the shared preparation, service handoff, filament and vat-resin processes, and material companions into one reviewable structure.

The existing live PLA/ABS guides and their material-page sections remain the published baseline. The pages linked below are review drafts. They identify their intended production destinations and keep navigation within this review set so the complete reader journey can be assessed together.

The current simulator index resolves to 82 canonical English simulator pages, with three translation subpages and five legacy redirects counted separately. The source register records which inspected builds mention a printed component and the bounded source search for those cases. A repository listing, an actual file transfer and a complete manufacturing package are different findings.

The source register records full retrieval of the identified Medical Makers tibial, humeral and pediatric files, maxSIMIO and UdeMHSBA repository files, Lee project files, lower-limb STL and OBJ files and the REAL CRIC airway shared by Kei and Calvo. The maxSIMbox2GO files remain related platform geometry whose exact correspondence to the evaluated Micallef revision is unconfirmed. The lower-limb colour route now has four fully retrieved OBJ meshes, with four MTL definitions and two PNG textures verified as their dependencies. These files are counted separately from the STL sources. The register records the applicable file terms and identity limits; it does not redistribute the original model binaries.

The reversed lower-limb alternative-folder labels were corrected in the saved simulator revision and the source register. The guides continue to distinguish printed moulds from cast silicone anatomy and an article's licence from the licence attached to geometry.

No emails, email drafts, access requests or outreach have been created. Model sourcing and qualification are the current actions.

The guide set uses a common purpose, workflow, production route, requirements, preparation, manufacture/finishing, inspection, troubleshooting and source structure. Instructions identify an action, an observable check and a recovery route. Legacy PLA/ABS step headings are retained so their eventual production update can preserve existing anchors.

The two new resin diagrams extend the existing text-free vector convention. Each has a 600 × 320 source canvas and five PNG widths: 300, 450, 600, 900 and 1200 pixels. The largest export is 1200 × 640. Captions and descriptions remain native page text. The drawings explain manufacturing concepts; they are not simulator geometry or evidence of a completed build.

The Gillis resin candidate and Lee TPU case have separate qualification briefs. A useful process guide can be reviewed while exact model access, material/configuration details or acceptance criteria remain unresolved; the candidate is not described as a complete reproducible build until those requirements are met.

PETG, PA/nylon and ASA have admission records tied to named demand and source completeness. They do not yet have empty material guides. PolyJet and SLS have explicit provider routes because their process requirements differ from desktop vat-resin and filament printing.

The complete source ledgers, 82-page inventory, qualification briefs, editorial/visual/localisation contract, five-size assets and publication receipts belong to the existing PR 282 continuation. Source inspection, file transfer, format checks, page rendering, human review and physical-build evidence are recorded separately. This development pass does not claim a physical build, clinical validation or a completed human usability/language review.

Review the linked pages and their source-specific questions as one set. The source register's next actions concern file identity, permissions or manufacturing completeness; later outreach remains a separate decision.