Jump to content

TissueDB/Simulators/Knot Tying Force-Feedback Simulator (Amiel)

From Appropedia


The Knot Tying Force-Feedback Simulator (Amiel) ("Knoti") is a low-cost, bench-top force-measurement device built from a hook, a data sensor and a feedback unit wired to a computer, for practising one-handed square knot tying in vessel ligation.[1] As the trainee ties a knot, it signals in real time when the pulling force rises above 1.3 N, the maximum force expert surgeons use, so novices learn to tie a secure knot without tearing the thread or avulsing the vessel.

Field Details
Features and Basic Operation The device has four parts. A hook holds the knot (A). A plexiglass tube over the hook simulates a deep surgical field (B). A data sensor measures the reaction force and connects to a personal computer with a USB cable (C). A feedback unit carries green and red lights and an alarm circuit (D). A green light and an intermittent beep show a force below 1.3 N. A red light and a persistent beep show a force above 1.3 N. That threshold is the maximum force experts used in the developers' earlier study. The software records total force, peak pulling force, peak pushing force and completion time for each knot. Buildability note: The parts are inexpensive. This is not a build-from-local-materials trainer. It needs a force sensor, a feedback circuit and a computer that runs the logging software. Amiel et al. 2020 does not specify any of the three.
Current Development Status Built and validated by its developers — construct validity and a training benefit shown in published studies (Amiel et al. 2019, 2020); operating-room skill transfer not yet demonstrated.
Estimated Build Time and Cost
Not stated in source.
Specialized Tools and Equipment A personal computer runs the data-logging software. The software records the force readings over USB. Laufer et al. 2016 documents the original device. Amiel et al. 2020 does not give the software specifications. The 2020 validation study analysed the recorded force data in R (R-Project v3.4.1). Consumables (use-time): 3-0 silk suture and surgical gloves. The source used Sofsilk 3-0 (Medtronic).
Version Version 1 — as described in Amiel et al. 2020 (American Journal of Surgery 220(1):100–104). The device was first reported in Laufer et al. 2016 and its validity established in Amiel et al. 2019; no later design iterations are documented.
Development Team Contact Information Imri Amiel, Roi Anteby, Moti Cordoba, Shlomi Laufer, Chaya Shwaartz, Danny Rosin, Mordechai Gutman, Amitai Ziv and Roy Mashiach — Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University; Sheba Medical Center (Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan); the Israel Center for Medical Simulation (MSR); and the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (Haifa). Corresponding author: Roi Anteby (roianteby@mail.tau.ac.il); first author Imri Amiel (imri.amiel@sheba.health.gov.il).

Sources: Amiel et al. 2020 (Am J Surg), Amiel et al. 2019 (Surgery) and Laufer et al. 2016 (Stud Health Technol Inform).

Structural Parts

Part Name Qty Material Cost Notes
Hook (component A) 1 Material not specified in source The point where the knot is tied, representing a vessel-ligation site. Material and dimensions are not specified in Amiel et al. 2020.
Plexiglass tube (component B) 1 Plexiglass This tube simulates deep knot tying. Its top is 3 cm above the top of the hook. Amiel et al. 2020 does not give its diameter, wall thickness or length.
Data sensor (component C) 1 Not specified in source This sensor connects to a personal computer with a USB cable. Amiel et al. 2020 does not give the sensor type, the force range or the sample rate.
Feedback unit (component D) 1 Coloured lights and an alarm circuit The developers added these parts to signal excessive force. A red light and a persistent beep show a reaction force above 1.3 N. A green light and an intermittent beep show a force below 1.3 N.
Base / mounting platform 1 Material not specified in source Holds the hook, tube, sensor and feedback unit together. Shown in Fig. 1 of Amiel et al. 2020, but its material and dimensions are not given.

Build Instructions

Phase 1: Obtain or fabricate the components

Amiel et al. (2020) is a validation study and does not give a construction procedure; the device's hardware is documented in Laufer et al. (2016) and Amiel et al. (2019), which were not staged for this page. The steps below describe the four components and how they relate (from Fig. 1 and the text) — they are not a verified build sequence from the source.

  1. The hook (component A), where the knot is tied. Material and dimensions are not specified.
  2. The plexiglass tube (component B), placed over the hook so the top of the tube sits 3 cm above the top of the hook.
  3. The data sensor (component C) connects to a personal computer with a USB cable. Amiel et al. 2020 does not give its type, dimensions, force range or sample rate.
  4. The feedback unit (component D) carries red and green lights and an alarm circuit set to the 1.3 N threshold. Amiel et al. 2020 does not give the circuit schematic.

Phase 2: How the components are arranged

The source gives no assembly procedure; the arrangement below is read from Fig. 1.

  1. The hook (A) is mounted on a base platform (visible in Fig. 1; material and dimensions not specified).
  2. The plexiglass tube (B) sits over the hook so the top of the tube is 3 cm above the hook.
  3. The data sensor (C) measures the vertical reaction force at the hook and connects to a computer by USB cable.
  4. The feedback unit (D) sits beside the hook-and-tube assembly and is driven by the sensor's reading against the 1.3 N threshold.

Phase 3: Verify function

  1. Launch the logging software and confirm the computer is reading the sensor over USB.
  2. Tie a test knot (3-0 silk, one-handed square-knot technique) on the hook inside the tube.
  3. Confirm the green light and intermittent beep when the reaction force is below 1.3 N.
  4. Confirm the red light and persistent beep when the reaction force is above 1.3 N.
  5. Confirm the software logs total force, peak pulling force, peak pushing force, and completion time for the knot.

Not Suitable For

The simulator trains one-handed square knot tying for vessel ligation with vertical-axis force feedback. Beyond that scope:

  • Lateral or multi-axis force measurement — the sensor measures the vertical axis only, a limitation the authors note.
  • Knot integrity testing under load — knot quality was judged visually by an examiner, not by tensile testing.
  • Trainees outside the tested group — the 2020 training-efficacy study enrolled only 14 PGY 1-2 surgical residents; it was not run with medical students or attending surgeons.
  • Tissue-model fidelity — the 1.3 N target was derived from expert performance, not from tissue models that measure tear forces.

References

  1. Amiel I, Anteby R, Cordoba M, Laufer S, Shwaartz C, Rosin D, Gutman M, Ziv A, Mashiach R (2020). "Feedback based simulator training reduces superfluous forces exerted by novice residents practicing knot tying for vessel ligation." American Journal of Surgery 220(1):100–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.027. PMID: 31806168.

Sources consulted for this page but not cited at a specific claim:

  • Amiel I, Anteby R, Cordoba M, Laufer S, Shwaartz C, Rosin D, Gutman M, Ziv A, Mashiach R (2020). "Feedback based simulator training reduces superfluous forces exerted by novice residents practicing knot tying for vessel ligation." American Journal of Surgery 220(1):100–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.027. PMID: 31806168.
  • Amiel I, Anteby R, Cordoba M, Laufer S, Shwaartz C, Rosin D, Gutman M, Ziv A, Mashiach R. "Experienced surgeons versus novice surgery residents: validating a novel knot tying simulator for vessel ligation." Surgery 2020;167(4):699–703 (first published online 2 November 2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.09.017. PMID: 31685234. Construct-validity study (15 experts vs 30 residents) establishing the ~1.3 N expert force threshold.
  • Laufer S, Amiel I, Nathwani JN, Mashiach R, Margalit RS, Ray RD, Ziv A, Pugh CM (2016). "A Simulator for Measuring Forces During Surgical Knots." Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 220:199–204. PMID: 27046578. Original Knoti device hardware description.
Simulator data
Alternative names Knoti (the device name used throughout the source papers; written "KNOTI" in the figures)


Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.