Scenic view of the mining operations in Chloride, Arizona. This is in the northwest corner of the state. Here, gold, silver, turquoise and other minerals were blasted from the mountains.

The earth's crust is full of small mineral deposits but their recovery may not be economic under the current system. Small-scale or "micro" mining ("artisanal mining") can extract wealth from small mineral deposits that might not be worthwhile to exploit by traditional large-scale mining processes. Despite smaller size, these deposits may still allow for high-margin operations. Small communities may profitably mine these reserves, although this requires a different mind-set. Communities can use low-tech excavation techniques, down to pick and shovel. Even if the infrastructure is more advanced, it does not have to be purchased and can possibly be built by the community itself, drastically cutting up-front investment requirements. Some recent advances in technology, such as biomining and cheap sensors can easily be scaled down.

Problem statement[edit | edit source]

  • Economic models for mining have been based on corporate objectives rather than community needs
  • Systems used in resource exploitation are geared toward the highly specialized; a network of specialists is used to keep the systems running
  • These systems can sometimes exclude communities from participation. They can be marginalized due to lack of access to education.

Some principles of community based micro-mining[edit | edit source]

  1. use machines that can be built from simple parts, are easy to use and repair
  2. minimize amount of material that is moved to the surface, try to process in situ and only transport the finished product
  3. minimize energy requirements per cubic meter, use free energy that may be available (solar, hydro, biomass; other "stranded" energy)
  4. slow but steady mining processes
  5. multiple products; use tailing piles for something ! (... construction, build dam, make terraces for farming, pile them onto existing domes to create underground caves, etc.)

Open source micromining vs. traditional artisanal mining[edit | edit source]

  • open source equipment reduces start-up cost
  • creative use of stranded energy
  • mining not for the general market but for own use of the mineral (= very different economics)
  • deep scientific understanding is required: metallurgy, chemistry, materials science, biotechnology; open source online education makes this accessible now
  • availability of inexpensive sensors, cameras and computing power
  • multiple products (e.g. extract multiple minerals, plan mining with an eye for subsequent use such as aquaculture, construction or underground infrastructure).
  • for metallurgy, use of induction furnace and digital fabrication are major improvements
  • advanced techniques for underground mine ventilation (e.g. using solar thermal or non-electric wind energy)
  • use of open source aerial ropeways to transport large amounts of earth/rock
  • low-level geothermal heat is major problem in traditional underground mining. Could be used for space heating in the future (greenhouses).

Product ecology[edit | edit source]

  • use of versatile agricultural equipment
  • mining of aluminum from clay which can be found almost anywhere
  • mining of copper with sulfuric acid (see: biomining)
  • use of biogas and syngas for carbothermal reduction of metals (example: here)
  • novel biotechnology techniques (see biomining)
  • in underground mining: use of thermal ventilation or compressed air

External links[edit | edit source]

FA info icon.svg Angle down icon.svg Page data
Authors Rasmus
License CC-BY-SA-3.0
Language English (en)
Translations Portuguese
Related 1 subpages, 2 pages link here
Impact 464 page views
Created February 4, 2011 by Rasmus
Modified October 17, 2022 by Felipe Schenone
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.