J.M.Pearce (talk | contribs) m (→See Also) |
J.M.Pearce (talk | contribs) m (→See Also) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
* [https://www.academia.edu/9416519/Feeding_Everyone_No_Matter_What_Managing_Food_Security_After_Global_Catastrophe Cover on Academia] | * [https://www.academia.edu/9416519/Feeding_Everyone_No_Matter_What_Managing_Food_Security_After_Global_Catastrophe Cover on Academia] | ||
* [https://www.facebook.com/FeedingEveryoneNoMatterWhat Facebook page] | * [https://www.facebook.com/FeedingEveryoneNoMatterWhat Facebook page] | ||
*[[Cost-effectiveness of interventions for alternate food in the United States to address agricultural catastrophes]] | |||
* [[Resilience to global food supply catastrophes]] | * [[Resilience to global food supply catastrophes]] | ||
* [[Feeding Everyone if the Sun is Obscured and Industry is Disabled]] | * [[Feeding Everyone if the Sun is Obscured and Industry is Disabled]] |
Revision as of 08:37, 17 October 2017
Source
- Denkenberger, D.C. & Pearce, J.M. Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions for Alternate Food to Address Agricultural Catastrophes Globally. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 7 (3), 205-215 (2016). doi:10.1007/s13753-016-0097-2 open access
Abstract
The literature suggests there is about a 1 % risk per year of a 10 % global agricultural shortfall due to catastrophes such as a large volcanic eruption, a medium asteroid or comet impact, regional nuclear war, abrupt climate change, and extreme weather causing multiple breadbasket failures. This shortfall has an expected mortality of about 500 million people. To prevent such mass starvation, alternate foods can be deployed that utilize stored biomass. This study developed a model with literature values for variables and, where no values existed, used large error bounds to recognize uncertainty. Then Monte Carlo analysis was performed on three interventions: planning, research, and development. The results show that even the upper bound of USD 400 per life saved by these interventions is far lower than what is typically paid to save a life in a less-developed country. Furthermore, every day of delay on the implementation of these interventions costs 100–40,000 expected lives (number of lives saved multiplied by the probability that alternate foods would be required). These interventions plus training would save 1–300 million expected lives. In general, these solutions would reduce the possibility of civilization collapse, could assist in providing food outside of catastrophic situations, and would result in billions of dollars per year of return.
Keywords
Agricultural catastrophe, Alternate food, Global catastrophic risk, Intervention cost-effectiveness
See Also
Feeding Everyone No Matter What |
---|
Error in widget YouTube: Unable to load template 'wiki:YouTube' |
- Feeding Everyone No Matter What - The full book main page
- Alternative Foods as a Solution to Global Food Supply Catastrophes
- David Denkenberger and Joshua Pearce, Feeding Everyone No Matter What: Managing Food Security After Global Catastrophe , 1st Edition, Academic Press, 2015
- Free Preview: Google books
- Cover on Academia
- Facebook page
- Cost-effectiveness of interventions for alternate food in the United States to address agricultural catastrophes
- Resilience to global food supply catastrophes
- Feeding Everyone if the Sun is Obscured and Industry is Disabled
- Dave Denkenberger Publications
- Feeding Everyone: Solving the Food Crisis in Event of Global Catastrophes that Kill Crops or Obscure the Sun
- OSE Wiki "Synfood" (i.e. protein and other dietary components from microbial organisms fed on gas or other hydrocarbons)