(→Suggested category changes - please comment: Food needs to be made a redirect.) |
(→Suggested category changes - please comment: cool with a caveat) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*[[:Category:Power and energy]] - merge into [[:Category:Energy]]. Any objections? --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] · <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 08:50, 2 April 2007 (PDT) | *[[:Category:Power and energy]] - merge into [[:Category:Energy]]. Any objections? --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] · <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 08:50, 2 April 2007 (PDT) | ||
*[[:Category:Alternative building]] - alternative is a problematic term, too hard to define. [[:Category:Buildings]] or [[:Category:Architecture]]? (I like buildings - simple and clear.) I think [[:Category:Sustainable bildings]] is unnecessary as sustainability, like appropriate technology, describes most things on the site. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] · <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 04:47, 3 April 2007 (PDT) | *[[:Category:Alternative building]] - alternative is a problematic term, too hard to define. [[:Category:Buildings]] or [[:Category:Architecture]]? (I like buildings - simple and clear.) I think [[:Category:Sustainable bildings]] is unnecessary as sustainability, like appropriate technology, describes most things on the site. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] · <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 04:47, 3 April 2007 (PDT) | ||
:I like [[:Category:Construction]], but whatever we go with we should probably keep '''Alternative building''' as a page instead of just a redirect. This page could list some definitions of Alternative building and then prominently link to the main Category. The reason is that potential visitors should be able to Google '''Alternative building''' and find us. Another possible solution would be to figure out how to add Meta tag description to pages (so we could put alternative building in as part of the description of Category:Construction or Category:building), and hope the search engines find it. --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 09:30, 16 April 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:30, 16 April 2007
Suggested category changes - please comment
- Note: to display category links, use a colon before the word category, e.g. [[:Category:Energy]].
- Category:Food and Agriculture - if we keep with this combination, we need to move to Category:Food and agriculture. But don't move until we decide on consensus what we want the category to be. Then Food needs to be made a redirect. --Chriswaterguy · talk 20:35, 30 March 2007 (PDT)
- Category:Power and energy - merge into Category:Energy. Any objections? --Chriswaterguy · talk 08:50, 2 April 2007 (PDT)
- Category:Alternative building - alternative is a problematic term, too hard to define. Category:Buildings or Category:Architecture? (I like buildings - simple and clear.) I think Category:Sustainable bildings is unnecessary as sustainability, like appropriate technology, describes most things on the site. --Chriswaterguy · talk 04:47, 3 April 2007 (PDT)
- I like Category:Construction, but whatever we go with we should probably keep Alternative building as a page instead of just a redirect. This page could list some definitions of Alternative building and then prominently link to the main Category. The reason is that potential visitors should be able to Google Alternative building and find us. Another possible solution would be to figure out how to add Meta tag description to pages (so we could put alternative building in as part of the description of Category:Construction or Category:building), and hope the search engines find it. --Lonny 09:30, 16 April 2007 (PDT)