m (tentative add of domain name controversy) |
m (sn features discussion) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
** on the other hand, some info is sensitive and external competitors/partners/parties might not feel the same way we do about transparency | ** on the other hand, some info is sensitive and external competitors/partners/parties might not feel the same way we do about transparency | ||
* domain name controversy | * domain name controversy | ||
* social networking features discussion | |||
Revision as of 13:04, 3 November 2007
Agenda
- methods of engagement / bylaws for board of advisors, directors, administrators, etc.
- public vs private strategy discussions
- on the one hand, transparency, openness, accessibility, etc. is great for all the usual reasons
- on the other hand, some info is sensitive and external competitors/partners/parties might not feel the same way we do about transparency
- domain name controversy
- social networking features discussion