(Improving translation tools for MediaWiki) |
(Writings and insights) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:* oversee technical work (UI, features, etc) incl managing volunteers and/or paid developers | :* oversee technical work (UI, features, etc) incl managing volunteers and/or paid developers | ||
:* [[Improving translation tools for MediaWiki]] - possible joint grant proposal with other interested parties. | :* [[Improving translation tools for MediaWiki]] - possible joint grant proposal with other interested parties. | ||
== Writings and insights == | |||
[http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/ten_nonprofit_funding_models/ Ten Nonprofit Funding Models]<ref>Stanford Social Innovation Review, March 16, 2009</ref> talks about: | |||
:the need to understand both the donor value proposition and the recipient value proposition... (and) about all nonprofits being in two “businesses”—one related to their program activities and the other related to raising charitable “subsidies.” | |||
[[Category:Appropedia funding]] | [[Category:Appropedia funding]] |
Revision as of 23:52, 26 March 2009
There are many different projects that deserve support. Consider this a brainstorming page, and write down anything you can think of.
- seek open license releases for valuable content (possible in connection with OLPC and/or Summer of Content).
- restructure content (along the lines of the Mozilla proposal)
- oversee development of OLPC content bundles
- pursue MoUs
- manage volunteers
- tech work
- do specific tech tasks and/or
- be responsible for all tech tasks and/or
- oversee technical work (UI, features, etc) incl managing volunteers and/or paid developers
- Improving translation tools for MediaWiki - possible joint grant proposal with other interested parties.
Writings and insights
Ten Nonprofit Funding Models[1] talks about:
- the need to understand both the donor value proposition and the recipient value proposition... (and) about all nonprofits being in two “businesses”—one related to their program activities and the other related to raising charitable “subsidies.”
- ↑ Stanford Social Innovation Review, March 16, 2009