Final Wood Frame with Filter

Abstract[edit | edit source]

ABS Pipe Desktop Pirate Protector

As students of Lonny Grafman's Fall 2020 Introduction to Engineering Design class (ENGR215) at Cal Poly Humboldt (HSU), Carolyn Heredia, Marlin Gast, and Franziska Daumberger took on the challenge of designing teacher barriers for Six Rivers Charter High School (SRCHS). CMF Design was tasked with creating an implement that would protect the teachers from contracting COVID-19 upon their eventual return to school.

The team created two versions of a desktop barrier that is easily replicable by students, effective in protecting teachers from COVID-19, and was within a budget that the team set. This design is called the Small Stationary Solid Barrier, or the Desktop Pirate Protector.

Background[edit | edit source]

COVID-19 is a virus that can be transmitted through airborne droplets. This virus created a global pandemic due to how easily it is transmitted, which causes problems in various industries in regards to people working in those industries. Arguably, schools are the most affected category and one of the categories that would greatly benefit from solutions to this problem. In order for students and teachers to eventually return to school, steps must be taken to ensure the safety of the students, but primarily the teachers, for without the teachers, there would be no place for the students to return to. Teachers need to be protected from the bacteria that their students inherently bring with them, and into the classrooms.

The Fall 2020 ENGR215 class was given the task of creating different solutions to this problem, specifically for Six Rivers Charter High School, a school serving 9th-12th grade students in Arcata, California.

Barriers between people in conjunction with masks are currently the best defense against transmitting the virus in public settings. Taking this into consideration, CMF Design chose to create a barrier to protect the teachers.

Problem statement and criteria[edit | edit source]

CMF Design has attempted to create a solution for the teachers at Six Rivers Charter High School to test. The main goal of the team was to design a product that would allow teachers to return and teach safely at Six Rivers Charter High School.

To create this solution, the first step was to choose criteria that would guide the brainstorming process. The team chose three governing criteria, as follows:

  • Student Replicability: This was the criteria that was weight the heaviest, and only met in weight of importance by effectiveness. This means that the students of SRCHS, with the tools already available to them from their Maker's Lab and manufacturing and wood shops, would be able to remake the chosen design. That the students would also be able to easily replicate the design was also of importance, so the chosen design would also have to reflect that. The materials being readily accessible and not specific was also taken into consideration when choosing the Desktop Pirate Protector.
    • A sub-criteria of the final design being replicable by students was that the final design also be easily resize-able. This was important to the team because CMF Design knew that at SRCHS, each classroom has a different teacher workspace/desk, and the chosen design should be able to be made to fit each different situation.
  • Effectiveness: Matching the importance of ease of replication by students, the effectiveness of the chosen design was also key in choosing the Desktop Pirate Protector. The whole purpose of this specific project was to ensure that teachers, while teaching, are protected from the bacteria that their students inherently bring into the classroom. The teachers need an implement that would protect them while they are teaching, while a student is asking a question, or while the students are moving around in the classroom for any given reason.
    • A sub-criteria of the effectiveness of the final design was that it should also be unobtrusive. It should not be in the way of the teacher instructing, speaking to the class, or performing instructive duties.
  • Cost: Another criteria for the final design was that it remained within a chosen budget. CMF Design designated $150 to be the most that a single unit should cost to build. The team wanted to ensure that no undue burden was placed on SRCHS in recreating the final product, if they choose to do so. It was known that the school would have to build multiple barriers, and knowing this, the team wanted the cost for each to be kept low.
Delphi Decision Method Chart

Description of final project[edit | edit source]

The final product consists of three parts that work together to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and other diseases. All parts of the product build upon the fundamentals of social distancing and do not substitute for masks or six feet between individuals.

The main part of the design is a rigid acrylic barrier that uses a stand to sit on the instructor's desk to provide protection from airborne droplets. A guided interaction method is employed to promote interaction through the center of the barrier, this comes in the form of a reusable filter is installed in the middle of the acrylic sheet. This filter enables sound to go through the barrier but not viruses or other particulate. The tactic of the air filter in the main barrier should greatly increase the effectiveness of the barrier.

The desktop barrier has two variations, one of which has a wood frame and the other employs ABS and/or PVC pipe to serve as the frame. The reason for two different materials is ease of access to the different materials, also if the equipment to cut wood is unavailable the ABS is extremely easy to work with and can be put together with purchased fittings.

The second part of the design that insures the effectiveness of the barrier is queue marks that go on the floor six feet from the teacher. The queue marks have been designed and are ready to print at whatever quantity is desired.

The final part of the design is a wall mount for a hand sanitizer dispenser, it is recommended that all students and teachers use this upon entry and exit to the classroom. Given most hand sanitizer dispensers are manual, it is recommended to have one designated individual, likely the teacher, who pumps the dispenser for everyone else.

The three part design will help create a safe space for students and teachers to return to in person learning.

Prototyping[edit | edit source]

Drawing of Desktop Pirate Protector

Various prototype barriers were created and tested throughout the design process. Two scale models were created to test for appeal, when presented to test subjects they were received very well so a full size model prototype was created. The purpose of the full size prototype was to test function, it was made with a large wood frame and cardboard barrier material. After testing the function of the barrier using a spray bottle and measurements of indirect airflow it was determined that the barrier did not need to be so large.

Another prototype was a piece of cardboard with a hole in the middle being compared to one without a hole. When a discussion through the pieces was attempted, it was found the one with the hole made it much easier to communicate; this led to the use of a hole and filter in the final product design.

For the queue marks the visual appeal of several different designs were tested before determining the final print layout.

Scale Model Prototype Barrier
Cardboard barrier material Prototype

Costs[edit | edit source]

The total amount of people hours that went into this project is 105 hours.

Wooden Barrier
Quantity Material Source Cost($) Total($)
1 Wood (2"x2.5"x8') Hardware Store $20 $20
40 Staples Hardware Store $3 $3
1 Acrylic Sheet Hardware Store $13 $13
1 Filter Hardware Store $4 $4
Total Cost $40
Pipe Barrier
Quantity Material Source Cost($) Total($)
1 ABS Pipe - 8ft, 2in diameter Hardware Store $7 $7
2 ABS T Hardware Store $2.50 $5
2 ABS Elbow Hardware Store $5 $10
8 Zip Ties Hardware Store $5 $5
1 Acrylic Sheet Hardware Store $13 $13
Total $40

Testing Results[edit | edit source]

CMF Design employed various tactics in testing our final product.

Family members of the team mates were recruited to sit behind the barriers, and the effectiveness of both the barrier and the filter for guided interaction were tested by simply conversing with family members. Their behaviors were observed and documented. The family members were observed to lean into the filter rather than leaning around the barrier if the volume of one participant's voice was lowered.

The team's family members were again recruited in testing the effectiveness of the barrier against particulate matter. Water was sprayed at the barrier, and the amount of water that got on the family members was observed and documented. Baking flour was also thrown at the barrier with a family member behind it, and the amount of flour that stuck to the family member was observed on documented. In both cases, the direct affects of the matter thrown at the family member were lessened by the presence of the barrier.

How to build[edit | edit source]

Because the main criteria of the team was to make each unit as easily replicable as possible, which included the sub criteria of each unit being resizable, there are no fixed dimensions for either the pipe or wooden barriers. This was done on purpose in order to make sure that each barrier would be able to fit each teacher's desk. That being said, a video has been made by the team to show an example of how to construct the pipe barrier. The wooden barrier uses solely a saw and a staple gun and is made to fit the chosen acrylic sheet. Slats are sawed into the wooden frame pieces and then the acrylic sheet is slid into the slats, and a staple gun is used to fix all the pieces together.

Maintenance[edit | edit source]

Because students and teachers will be around the Desktop Pirate Protector almost daily, and because it is in place to essentially "catch" any bacteria that is directed towards the teacher sitting behind it, the Desktop Pirate Protector has the potential to become a trap for bacteria. However, seeing as it is not something that should be touched often, the cleaning of the barrier can be left to the user's discretion. Acknowledging this, CMF Design still recommends that the barrier be cleaned periodically. This can simply be done with any kind of sanitizer.

Troubleshooting[edit | edit source]

The Desktop Pirate Protector was designed to be very simple and easy to use and build. Most problems that will arise can be fixed by ensuring that each barrier is made to be level, each fitting/piece is level and completely pressed all the way in, and the build process itself was completed with care. Below are some issues CMF Design anticipates as possible problems.

Problem Suggestion
Filter is not allowing air flow Replace/Wash (if applicable) filter
Barrier seems unstable/unsteady Wooden barrier: check staples. Pipe barrier: check that pipe fittings are level and tight

Discussion and next steps[edit | edit source]

Because this is inherently such a simple design, there are several additions to the overall design that can be made. These include additions such as the queue marks and hand sanitizer holder listed in the description of the final project. There is truly no limit to what else can be added, or how the Desktop Pirate Protector can be modified. This includes resizing (as was stated in our criteria) as well as changing the shape of the frame.

Suggestions for future changes[edit | edit source]

CMF Design had several alternative designs that were simple iterations on the Desktop Pirate Protector. These iterations, while not outlined here, are simple as well and the Desktop Pirate Protector could easily be changed to become any one of the following iterations:

  • A large, rolling, single panel barrier
  • A large, rolling, multi panel barrier
  • A large, stationary, single panel barrier
  • A large, stationary, multi panel barrier

These iterations can be completed by using the wooden and/or the pipe frames.

Ventilation methods (such as fans) would improve the overall function of the design.

Videos[edit | edit source]

Page data
Authors Franziska Daumberger, Marlin Gast
Published 2020
License CC-BY-SA-4.0
Impact Number of views to this page and its redirects. Updated once a month. Views by admins and bots are not counted. Multiple views during the same session are counted as one. 49
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.