Jump to content

SELF/Perioperative Nursing/Electro-Surgical Units/Psychomotor Skills Practice Assessment

From Appropedia

Psychomotor Assessment Rubric for Electrosurgical Units (ECSACONM)

[edit | edit source]

Overview

[edit | edit source]

This page provides a psychomotor assessment rubric for evaluating electrosurgical unit (ESU) setup competency, developed for perioperative nursing training under ECSACONM (East, Central and Southern Africa College of Nursing). It is a companion assessment tool to the Electrosurgical Units Skills Practice Instructions page, used by evaluators to rate student/practitioner performance on each step of ESU setup and safety verification on a 5-point scale.

Purpose

[edit | edit source]

To provide a standardized scoring framework for assessing clinical competency in electrosurgical unit setup, ranging from "Clinically Unacceptable / Not Performed" (1) to "Excellent" (5), with defined criteria at each anchor point.

Rating Scale

[edit | edit source]
  • 1 – Clinically Unacceptable / Not Performed
  • 2 – (between 1 and 3, no separate descriptor)
  • 3 – Clinically Acceptable / Performed
  • 4 – (between 3 and 5, no separate descriptor)
  • 5 – Excellent

Assessment Rubric

[edit | edit source]
Step Name Assessment Method 1 – Clinically Unacceptable / Not Performed 2 3 – Clinically Acceptable / Performed 4 5 – Excellent Comments
1 Gather supplies Articulated Not done Done
2 Plug in and inspect ESU unit Observed Fails to inspect equipment, misses obvious defects, or creates unsafe setup conditions Safely powers and inspects the ESU, identifying major defects and confirming basic functionality Performs a systematic inspection, identifies subtle hazards, and verifies complete readiness before proceeding
3 Connect ESU handpiece and foot pedal if needed Observed Incorrect connections, loose connections, unsafe foot pedal placement, or poor cable management Correctly connects all required accessories and positions them safely for use Efficiently connects and organizes equipment while proactively preventing cable and activation hazards
4 Select appropriate settings for procedure (cut vs coagulation) Observed Selects incorrect mode or inappropriate power settings without verification Selects the correct mode and power setting appropriate for the planned procedure and confirms settings before use Independently selects appropriate settings, explains the rationale, and performs an effective cross-check with the surgical team
5 Inspect and prepare grounding pad Observed Fails to inspect equipment, misses obvious defects, or creates unsafe setup conditions Correctly inspects the grounding pad and prepares an appropriate application site with no major safety concerns Thoroughly evaluates all risk factors and demonstrates exemplary site selection and preparation
6 Apply grounding pad to patient Observed Incorrect placement, poor adhesion, wrinkles, partial contact, or placement over unsafe anatomy Correctly assesses the patient and grounding pad; applies pad on an appropriate site with intact skin and adequate contact Applies pad flawlessly while proactively preventing displacement, moisture exposure, and pressure-related issues
7 Connect grounding pad to ESU unit Observed Connection is loose, incorrect, or creates tension that may compromise pad contact Correctly connects the return electrode and routes cables safely Demonstrates optimal cable management, connection security, and protection against inadvertent disconnection
8 Perform safety test if unit has self-test feature Observed Omits safety check or ignores alarms and fault indicators Completes self-test appropriately and responds correctly to alarms or warnings Performs comprehensive readiness verification and demonstrates excellent troubleshooting skills when faults occur
9 Holster handpiece and organize cables safely Observed Handpiece left unsecured, cables create hazards, or risk of accidental activation exists Handpiece safely holstered and cables organized appropriately Creates an exceptionally safe and organized environment that minimizes activation, burn, and trip hazards
10 Confirm entire system is ready before incision Observed Fails to perform final readiness assessment or misses significant safety concerns Performs complete final readiness check and confirms safe setup before use Conducts a thorough, systematic readiness review that identifies and corrects potential hazards before activation
Page data
Keywords surgery, health
SDG SDG03 Good health and well-being
Authors Ian-laurel
License CC-BY-SA-4.0
Organizations SELF, ECSACONM
Language English (en)
Related 0 subpages, 1 pages link here
Views 0 page views (analytics)
Created July 14, 2026 by 2607:FEA8:3441:6400:9DB7:3F82:7765:2223
Last edit July 14, 2026 by 2607:FEA8:3441:6400:9DB7:3F82:7765:2223
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.