Criteria[edit | edit source]

Open aid and open development refer to several things:

The word "open" has become trendy. It is important to distinguish between true openness and (for example) APIs for data which come with restrictive use agreements.

Larger aims[edit | edit source]

Larger aims might include:

  • Better transparency of aid spending. Note:
  • More coherent information about aid projects. E.g.:
    • The AidData project is the largest free online directory of development activities, telling who is doing what in international development, where, and with what funds. AidData is the result of a merger between Project-Level Aid and Development Gateway's Accessible Information on Development Assistance.
  • Improved linkages of outcomes to activities and funds spent. In particular:
    • making the information buried in monitoring and evaluation reports more accessible and structured. Information could then be gleaned across projects, activities, and donors. (Note that semantic tools in MediaWiki are one possible way of making these comparisons; other tools also can, and allow for more sophisticated analysis and presentation.) The obvious application is to look at recent donor funded projects on an issue or in a country, to relatively quickly see which activities did and didn't work well, and to have some immediate data to begin asking why (or why not).
  • Making development knowledge and experience easy to find, organize, mash up and use.
    • There is a vast amount of knowledge, but it tends to be locked away or accessible only in very restricted ways. opening this up would certainly lead to deeper understanding and insights.
    • An open standard for publishing web content is needed: reports, tools, resources, case studies, blogs, and other formats, to allow searching by topic and country without hunting through stove-piped data repositories. An extended version of RSS way allow this. E.g. note how Agrifeeds aggregates and organizes content by topic and country, with many donors and projects.[1]

Open aid[edit | edit source]

Open aid seems to be less widely discussed than open development. The essentials of open aid might include:

  • Transparency of aid programs, regarding how money is spent, and the measured outcomes of the project.
  • Publishing practices and procedures openly (and under an open license).
  • crowdsourcing ideas for solutions to international development challenges, for constructive enhancement of programs and strategic planning.
  • incentivizing participation from people outside of formal development institutions to make development projects work more effectively.
  • creating open platforms that enable new actors and those at the base of the pyramid to create feedback loops for donors and other traditional development organizations to strengthen their systems.

Major agencies[edit | edit source]

Most of the major agencies do not practice open aid or open development. Exceptions include:

  • USAID - as a federal US government body, all writing produced by the agency is public domain. How does the agency fare on other measures of openness?
  • Surely there is more than one example? Please help expand this list!

Multilateral international institutions[edit | edit source]

The United Nations and World Bank and their many component organizations (such as the Food and Agriculture Organization) are funded by taxpayers around the world; thus it might be expected that they would be accountable and enable people to use the data that they paid for. In practice, these organizations are far from open. Their permissions statements specify non-commercial and educational use only, and presumably some form of no derivatives agreement is implied - it is hard to tell due to the lack of a clear content license.

In the few cases where a clear license has been used, they typically use a Non-commercial clause, and even a No derivatives clause.[verification needed]

A partial exception is WaterWiki[1], a United Nations (UNDP) project, which uses the CC-BY-SA license[2] (though it isn't easy to find this notice). On the downside, editing is not open, it is not clear whose participation is invited, and registration is by request, which they may not respond to, even for qualified water professionals. Much of the content is posted as PDFs (a proprietary document format from which it is difficult to extract information) attached to pages, and it's not clear if they are covered by the open license too. Thus while adopting a form of radical openness (a wiki) it is in fact quite closed.

Are there better exceptions to this? What are the hopes for change?

Organizations and networks in open development and open aid[edit | edit source]

  • "Open Development Wiki" There has been talk about an open development wiki; in practice, Appropedia is the only active wiki on open development[verification needed] and is now expanding in its development and aid-related pages.
  • Working Group on Open Knowledge in Development - Open Knowledge Foundation
  • openDev: Open Development, Data and Collaboration - social network site set up for a 2008 Open Development BarCamp.
  • - Visit today to learn about innovations in open approaches to international development. Join the listserve and find out more about the Global Development Commons initiative at USAID that promotes innovations in international development through knowledge-sharing, collaborative problem-solving and partnerships.

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. Open Development Barcamp Recap, July 14. 2009. Four key point.

See also[edit | edit source]

External links[edit | edit source]

FA info icon.svg Angle down icon.svg Page data
Authors Chris Watkins, Elizabeth Kountze
License CC-BY-SA-3.0
Language English (en)
Related 0 subpages, 1 pages link here
Aliases Open developent, Open development, OpenDevelopment, Open aid and development, Open development, open aid
Impact 1,188 page views
Created July 11, 2009 by Chris Watkins
Modified May 28, 2024 by Kathy Nativi
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.