I've cleaned up the style of this article quite a bit. A lot of this was consolidating redundancies left over from the merging, including some minor changes to the organizational structure. I directly linked the citations I could find. Some of them are not available and should be replaced. Some of the passages were plagiarized. I turned these into direct quotations when possible, but some may remain undiscovered at this point.
The bigger issue currently is the relevance of the content and citations. All of the sourcable citations are over a decade old. Therefore the claim in the article that studies have been inconclusive may be outdated. The article is also geared more toward consumer perceptions about conventional ag. That's fine as far as it goes, but only one specific aspect of what the aritcle purports to be about. --Ethan (talk) 11:55, 12 May 2015 (PDT)