(response to moving content) |
(→Regarding moving the content to [[Improved cook stoves]]: template notice?) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I think that the remaining sections on design, testing and conclusions should be in a more specifically renamed project page. Such as [[Dan and Tyler rocket stove]]. Only Dan, Tyler or Lonny should do any of the content moving as this is a 305 project. Thank you, --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 17:48, 20 April 2007 (PDT) | I think that the remaining sections on design, testing and conclusions should be in a more specifically renamed project page. Such as [[Dan and Tyler rocket stove]]. Only Dan, Tyler or Lonny should do any of the content moving as this is a 305 project. Thank you, --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 17:48, 20 April 2007 (PDT) | ||
:Very good. | |||
:A header template would be a good idea. Rather than a specific {{tl|305}} template, it would be more useful to make a generic template of the form <nowiki>{{project page|Groupname}}</nowiki>, creating a notice that "this is a page by Groupname..." - perhaps with an additional option saying how open (or not) the group is to receiving edits by other people. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] · <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 19:51, 20 April 2007 (PDT) |
Revision as of 02:51, 21 April 2007
Regarding moving the content to Improved cook stoves
I agree that the following sections should eventually be moved to Category:Improved cook stoves (maybe splitting off one or two into their own pages, such as Traditional three rock fire).
- 1 Traditional Three Rock Fire
- 2 Why Improved Fuel Stove are Good
- 3 Stove Programs
- 6 Literature review
I think that the remaining sections on design, testing and conclusions should be in a more specifically renamed project page. Such as Dan and Tyler rocket stove. Only Dan, Tyler or Lonny should do any of the content moving as this is a 305 project. Thank you, --Lonny 17:48, 20 April 2007 (PDT)
- Very good.
- A header template would be a good idea. Rather than a specific {{305}} template, it would be more useful to make a generic template of the form {{project page|Groupname}}, creating a notice that "this is a page by Groupname..." - perhaps with an additional option saying how open (or not) the group is to receiving edits by other people. --Chriswaterguy · talk 19:51, 20 April 2007 (PDT)