We continue to develop resources related to the COVID-19 pandemic. See COVID-19 initiatives on Appropedia for more information.

Difference between revisions of "Incentives for sustainability"

From Appropedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Comparison: wikitable)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
'''Incentives''' for sustainable action take several forms:
 
'''Incentives''' for sustainable action take several forms:
  
{|border="1"
+
{| class=wikitable
 
!Incentive!!Advantages!!Disadvantages
 
!Incentive!!Advantages!!Disadvantages
 
|-
 
|-
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|Taxes||Revenue||Difficulty and controversy involved in setting level of taxes; difficult for authority to raise taxes to the appropriate level due to political and electoral pressure.
 
|Taxes||Revenue||Difficulty and controversy involved in setting level of taxes; difficult for authority to raise taxes to the appropriate level due to political and electoral pressure.
 
|-
 
|-
|Markets (e.g. carbon trading)||Potential disadvantage: If allocations are given to existing emitters, that effectively rewards polluters.||Strong motivation of personal gain; efficient allocation of resources.  
+
|Markets (e.g. carbon trading)||Strong motivation of personal gain; efficient allocation of resources. ||Potential disadvantage: If allocations are given to existing emitters, that effectively rewards polluters.
 +
|-
 +
|Game ||Strong motivation of personal gain; to win. (I can't find it now, but in the mid 1990s Chicago had a 'superhero' would go through people's garbage and if everything was correctly put together (compost, glass, plastic, metal, garbage) then the family would win $500. It was brilliant.||Potential disadvantage: not taken seriously
 
|}
 
|}
  
Note that increased awarness and access to information can help people to make better choices - these are not incentives in themselves, but can make the incentives more effective.  
+
Note that increased awareness and access to information can help people to make better choices - these are not incentives in themselves, but can make the incentives more effective.
  
 
==Other suggestions==
 
==Other suggestions==
Line 29: Line 31:
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
* [[Measures to stop global warming]]
 
* [[Measures to stop global warming]]
 +
* [[Incentives to pollute]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
*[[Wikipedia:Carbon tax]]
 
*[[Wikipedia:Carbon tax]]
 
*[[Wikipedia:Carbon trading]]
 
*[[Wikipedia:Carbon trading]]
*[http://www.natcap.org/ Natural Capitalism] - website of the book about making sustainability profitable.  
+
*[http://www.natcap.org/ Natural Capitalism] - website of the book about making [[sustainability]] profitable.  
  
 
{{stub}}
 
{{stub}}
  
 +
[[Category:Incentives]]
 
[[Category:Sustainability]]
 
[[Category:Sustainability]]
 
[[Category:Policy ideas]]
 
[[Category:Policy ideas]]

Latest revision as of 04:01, 6 January 2012

Comparison[edit]

Incentives for sustainable action take several forms:

Incentive Advantages Disadvantages
Personal satisfaction or sense of responsibility Only a small minority will take serious action. (Many us are well-intentioned but don't get far beyond good intentions.)
Social pressure/conformity No cost
Regulation Possibility of corruption? Depends on an authority to make decisions - likely to be less creative than a more open approach.
Taxes Revenue Difficulty and controversy involved in setting level of taxes; difficult for authority to raise taxes to the appropriate level due to political and electoral pressure.
Markets (e.g. carbon trading) Strong motivation of personal gain; efficient allocation of resources. Potential disadvantage: If allocations are given to existing emitters, that effectively rewards polluters.
Game Strong motivation of personal gain; to win. (I can't find it now, but in the mid 1990s Chicago had a 'superhero' would go through people's garbage and if everything was correctly put together (compost, glass, plastic, metal, garbage) then the family would win $500. It was brilliant. Potential disadvantage: not taken seriously

Note that increased awareness and access to information can help people to make better choices - these are not incentives in themselves, but can make the incentives more effective.

Other suggestions[edit]

This section allows some room for speculation.

  • Instead of "cap and trade," combine the carbon tax and carbon trading schemes, with "cap, pay and trade" where emitters must pay a basic amount for the carbon credits, which they can then trade. This would raise money for energy efficiency and clean energy schemes and research, and reduce the basic injustice (alleged by some left-wing and green groups) of the biggest and most inefficient polluters being rewarded with valuable carbon credits. --suggested by Chriswaterguy · talk 19:17, 13 March 2007 (PDT)

Suggested projects[edit]

Consider the policy suggestion(s) above, e.g. "cap, pay and trade." Have they been suggested before? Model their impact.[Suggested project]

See also[edit]

External links[edit]



Aprologo-shiny-clearest.png This page is a "stub" - it needs more content.

You are invited to add your knowledge.

No registration needed - just edit.
We monitor for spam and to keep these pages improving.