Warning! You are not logged in. Log in or create an account to have your edits attributed to your username rather than your IP, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 10: Line 10:


== Welcome! ==
== Welcome! ==
Hi! Sounds like you probably don't need the usual tips for newbies, but anyway, welcome...!


<div style="border:2px solid #fda; padding:8px; margin:1px; background-color:#fffdf9">
<div style="border:2px solid #fda; padding:8px; margin:1px; background-color:#fffdf9">
Line 29: Line 26:
</div>
</div>


Hi! Sounds like you probably don't need the usual tips for newbies, but anyway, welcome...!


Good questions - our policies are still being developed (I'll have a look and see if there's any you haven't seen - but I think [[Appropedia:Rigor]] is the main one. but the bottom line, I think, is that as a community of science-minded people, we require contributions to be consistent with science. There are potential pitfalls in this, of course, and we have other policies that I believe will provide safeguards - openness, allowing opinion (in the appropriate place, and marked as such) and encouraging questions. So there may well be pages on things we believe are pseudoscience - and these should have a rigorous discussion, clearly laying out the arguments for each side.  
Good questions - our policies are still being developed (I'll have a look and see if there's any you haven't seen - but I think [[Appropedia:Rigor]] is the main one. but the bottom line, I think, is that as a community of science-minded people, we require contributions to be consistent with science. There are potential pitfalls in this, of course, and we have other policies that I believe will provide safeguards - openness, allowing opinion (in the appropriate place, and marked as such) and encouraging questions. So there may well be pages on things we believe are pseudoscience - and these should have a rigorous discussion, clearly laying out the arguments for each side.  
Warning! All contributions to Appropedia are released under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license unless otherwise noted (see Appropedia:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here! You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted material without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page:

This page is a member of a hidden category:

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.