The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 188: | Line 188: | ||
::::I don't want to merge at present as my primary issues about branding and access have not yet been addressed. I think the best approach from here is for the sustainable housing and other content on GLP to stay there and the Appropedia portal to point to it. When and if the portal architecture improves, we can review the situation again. [[User:Peter Campbell|Peter Campbell]] 19:12, 22 April 2007 (PDT) | ::::I don't want to merge at present as my primary issues about branding and access have not yet been addressed. I think the best approach from here is for the sustainable housing and other content on GLP to stay there and the Appropedia portal to point to it. When and if the portal architecture improves, we can review the situation again. [[User:Peter Campbell|Peter Campbell]] 19:12, 22 April 2007 (PDT) | ||
== Appropedia in the next few days == | == Appropedia in the next few days == | ||
Line 216: | Line 212: | ||
== Anonymous vs identified editors == | == Anonymous vs identified editors == | ||
New thread on this topic. Here is a recent reference that outlines pros & cons. In my experience, I am leaning a little towards Sanger's position. I know this is heresy for many Wikipedians, but I see lots of bad behaviour | New thread on this topic. Here is a recent reference that outlines pros & cons. In my experience, I am leaning a little towards Sanger's position. I know this is heresy for many Wikipedians, but I see lots of bad behaviour perpertrated by people operating under pseudonymns and have seen several good editors bow out after protracted conflicts. Bottom line is, if you have something to say or contribute, why shouldn't you put your real name on it? | ||
* [http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/facts-and-friction/2007/04/21/1176697155451.html?page=fullpage Facts and friction: Wikipedia's quest for credibility], The Age, 22/4/07 | * [http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/facts-and-friction/2007/04/21/1176697155451.html?page=fullpage Facts and friction: Wikipedia's quest for credibility], The Age, 22/4/07 |