The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
2nd, what I was trying to say with the "axis of knowing" is simply that there's more objectively known things, like data is a good example, or things that tend to be more static... then there are more subjectively known things (that can be frustrating for others to know that too unless they experience it, like the euphoria in believing in God for example, you know?), and here, it seems like the definition I added to was more at objectively known criteria, that life cycle analyses (l.c.a.s) would get at you know? compared to my expansion of the definition here... given where we're/the times are now, my emphasis on this seemed appropriate, but I mean, I guess I could just rephrase to "...future phase of AT that includes more subjectively known criterion" or something? | 2nd, what I was trying to say with the "axis of knowing" is simply that there's more objectively known things, like data is a good example, or things that tend to be more static... then there are more subjectively known things (that can be frustrating for others to know that too unless they experience it, like the euphoria in believing in God for example, you know?), and here, it seems like the definition I added to was more at objectively known criteria, that life cycle analyses (l.c.a.s) would get at you know? compared to my expansion of the definition here... given where we're/the times are now, my emphasis on this seemed appropriate, but I mean, I guess I could just rephrase to "...future phase of AT that includes more subjectively known criterion" or something? | ||
3rd, yes Moribund, this "life energy" thing I'm referring is actually an example of what I mean by subjectively understood/known... hmm, an example may be toward "painting with all the colors of the wind" like that song from the Disney movie Pocahontas many years ago. so, if a l.c.a. is done on wind turbines, you'll get a more objectively | 3rd, yes Moribund, this "life energy" thing I'm referring is actually an example of what I mean by subjectively understood/known... hmm, an example may be toward "painting with all the colors of the wind" like that song from the Disney movie Pocahontas many years ago. so, if a l.c.a. is done on wind turbines, you'll get a more objectively OBSERVED/OBSERVABLE energy score included, right? but, there are basically energies that the very method or nature of the more objective Science (that I'M familiar with at least) may not realize - especially LIFE energies... it can be more dynamic and complicated, including NOT necessarily making more life(-energy) sense, for some (depending on their karmas or deservability, for example). but does that basically make more sense now? any suggestions how to reword that part too? | ||
Again, thank you for helping me to clarify goodly. --[[User:Keshavboddula|Keshavboddula]] ([[User talk:Keshavboddula|talk]]) 15:06, 3 April 2019 (PDT) | Again, thank you for helping me to clarify goodly. --[[User:Keshavboddula|Keshavboddula]] ([[User talk:Keshavboddula|talk]]) 15:06, 3 April 2019 (PDT) | ||