Good to see you here. I answered your question briefly at [[Category talk:Energy#forum on renewable energy]].
<references/>
Our regular greeting follows. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] 18:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey, all:
Forgive me, but I must be blunt. Some misguided focus has created many many details unsupported by some fundamentals. There needs to be topics on the 2 most sustainable sources of generating electrical energy: one is "Solar Energy", and the other is "Wind Energy". Subcategories for each should include at least 2: "Small Scale (Residential/Business)" and "Utility Scale". I had the editing skills, I would add them, but I still need to learn.
Welcome to the Appropedia wiki. Please make yourself at home! If you need a general wiki-tutorial, see [[Help:Contents|the main help page]] (or the [[Wikieducator:Wikieducator tutorial|more in-depth one]] on WikiEducator).
Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
:Hi David,
Check your [[Special:Preferences|preferences]] and be sure you verify your email address and turn on email notification if you'd like it -- you can find out when your talk page, or any page on your [[Special:Watchlist|watchlist]], is modified. You may want to upload a photo or information about yourself to your userpage (which is at http://appropedia.org/User:{{PAGENAMEE}}).
:Thank you for your input. Right now these topics ([[Solar]], [[Photovoltaics]] and [[Wind power]]) are under [[Renewable energy]], but maybe they should just be listed under [[Energy]], i.e. getting rid of the subcategory renewable and calling it all energy. What do you think?
:Thanks, --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 12:16, 8 August 2008 (PDT)
If you have a particular interest or project in mind, go ahead and start it! If you have questions or suggestions, the best place to leave them is at the [[Appropedia_talk:Village_pump|Village pump]] - you should get a fast response. Or, feel free to leave me a note on my [[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk page]] if you have further questions, need help finding your way around, have a cool idea for a project, or just want to chat.
Hey, Lonny:
Glad to have you here!
Thanks for the quick response! Your response immediately brings to mind for me how obsolete or ill-defined the terms "renewable" and "alternative" are. Both have become "Humpty Dumpty" words, used for whatever use the user intends--and without explanation--and with no knowledge by the user. Both nonetheless have applications, but which are much narrower than currently in place. "Renewable" applies to, for example, forests which take 50 years to be "renewed", and also Wind and Sun, which are at any instant the same as any other. Since Wind and Sun are dependent on Solar System and planetary astrophysics, they are essentially limitless, while forests can be obliterated, and if normal biological succession is prevented e.g., by agriculture or parking lots, the forests never "renew". Calling both "renewable" is truly trying to squeeze apples and oranges together.
[[User:Chriswaterguy|-Chriswaterguy]]
</div>
"Alternative" was once applied to lifestyles, not energy, and should be returned to that field. To further discredit the term I read a blurb or ad slogan regarding residential sustainable energy, stating "'alternative' is now mainstream".
Thanks everyone...you guys rock. I will check out the sources listed. And Lonny, per your suggestion, i have posted my much larger question here: http://www.appropedia.org/User:Buddhanoir/Energy_outline. Many thanks to you all. still learning how to post properly
My admittedly rather extreme classification would be "Sustainable Energy", with Solar, Wind, Hydro, Tidal, and Geothermal as categories. My position is that nothing else meets the definition of sustainable. Not agrofuels, not nuclear--there is nothing sustainable about using yet more habitat for agrofuels, and there is not one single step in the nuclear process that is sustainable--fatal flaws for each, regardless of how many different ways they are packaged and marketed.
I would use the subcategories I mentioned originally for each of the 5 categories above. I guess those would be 3rd level taxa. All are reasonably possible technologies. As evidence, one of the marketing techniques of Big Carbon is to ignore and obscure residential sustainability, since its use hurts their bottom line. It is also the official attitude of many USA state legislatures--for the same reason.
Incidentally, "geothermal" applies only to geological heat deep in the crust used to create steam to power turbines. It does not apply to Earth-coupled or ground-coupled heatpumps. These terms and techniques are completely different. I don't know if this mistake is present here or not, so forgive me if the distinction has already been made--it is common elsewhere.
At the very least, I certainly agree with getting rid of "Renewable" and "Alternative". "Sustainable" and its forms then need to have a rigorous, defensible, unerodible definition. And, one day I will learn enough HTML to apply the organization and formatting, but for now, thanks for the opportunity!
David
Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun! 15:16 CDT 8 Aug 2008
== forum on renewable energy ==
Hello Appropedia. I'm entirely new to this site (and new to wikiposts in general), but I was wondering if there existed a forum or online community where I could post questions about renewable energy. This is for a research paper for school. I was hoping to connect with actual scientists and researchers in the field who work closely with peer-to-peer projects. I wanted to outline the basics of my paper (which includes a business model) and have these p2p researchers/scientists help fill in the gaps and find inconsistencies in my overall logic.
I hope this is the right place to post. if not, can one of you kindly point me in the right direction.
Thanx in advance,
-Austin ([[User:Buddhanoir]])
:Hi, Austin - thanks for asking.
:check http://globalswadeshi.ning.com/ - some smart people there. I'll also ask one of the academics here. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] 18:04, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to the Appropedia wiki. Please make yourself at home! If you need a general wiki-tutorial, see the main help page (or the more in-depth one on WikiEducator).
Check your preferences and be sure you verify your email address and turn on email notification if you'd like it -- you can find out when your talk page, or any page on your watchlist, is modified. You may want to upload a photo or information about yourself to your userpage (which is at http://appropedia.org/User:Buddhanoir).
If you have a particular interest or project in mind, go ahead and start it! If you have questions or suggestions, the best place to leave them is at the Village pump - you should get a fast response. Or, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page if you have further questions, need help finding your way around, have a cool idea for a project, or just want to chat.
Thanks everyone...you guys rock. I will check out the sources listed. And Lonny, per your suggestion, i have posted my much larger question here: http://www.appropedia.org/User:Buddhanoir/Energy_outline. Many thanks to you all. still learning how to post properly
