Szimmerling (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Szimmerling (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*If you made the input page a little clearer that would make it easier. Like power consumption should just state that it is for the current set-up. | *If you made the input page a little clearer that would make it easier. Like power consumption should just state that it is for the current set-up. | ||
*Instead of suggesting default, perhaps as default include these numbers in the associated box. You could also include a note indicating 'these are default settings, change only if necessary'. This might help make the input page a little bit clearer. | *Instead of suggesting default, perhaps as default include these numbers in the associated box. You could also include a note indicating 'these are default settings, change only if necessary'. This might help make the input page a little bit clearer. | ||
Laptop ECM: | |||
*The Input page is very clear! Specifically the links provided for determining the numbers. Consider using this system in all ECMs. |
Revision as of 00:45, 11 February 2010
Your appropedia page looks good. I just made a few changes, however, you should include references, especially when quoting efficiencies and power consumption values.
Monitors ECM:
- Within your Monitor ECM i noticed you used $0.1568/kWh. When I looked at your reference, Utilities Kingston, and added it up i only got $0.108/kWh for commercial. Is there something I missed?
- If you made the input page a little clearer that would make it easier. Like power consumption should just state that it is for the current set-up.
- Instead of suggesting default, perhaps as default include these numbers in the associated box. You could also include a note indicating 'these are default settings, change only if necessary'. This might help make the input page a little bit clearer.
Laptop ECM:
- The Input page is very clear! Specifically the links provided for determining the numbers. Consider using this system in all ECMs.