No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
- In literature review add some writing to link ideas and evidence together, not just listing evidence in quotations | - In literature review add some writing to link ideas and evidence together, not just listing evidence in quotations | ||
== Feedback sections/template == | |||
Nice work so far. See below for comments on some sections: | |||
* Refer to format listed on this link http://www.appropedia.org/Engineering_305/Project_template_and_grading | |||
*Abstract | |||
** sentence structure needs improvement | |||
*Background | |||
** Good section just add that it was in the Spring 2015 semester | |||
** Add some information about northern California and where Humboldt State is located | |||
*Problem statement | |||
*Criteria | |||
** weighted criteria table should be in descending order of importance | |||
** Look over the constraints for maintainability, ease of use, and educational value once more | |||
*Literature Review | |||
** Make sure to put this section before the timeline and after criteria | |||
** Add some own discussion of information found instead of listing resources you have found | |||
*Construction | |||
** Include more detail in construction steps. | |||
** Number steps | |||
** Make sure to include this after literature review and before timeline | |||
*Timeline | |||
** Center timeline table on the screen | |||
*Costs | |||
** Be sure to include the total spent compared to the actual cost in table | |||
* Operation | |||
** Include link to MEOW page as well as brief table of steps explaining its operation | |||
* Maintenance | |||
** Include this section | |||
* Schedule | |||
** Not listed | |||
* Instructions | |||
** Include a table of instructions described on this link http://www.appropedia.org/Engineering_305/Project_template_and_grading | |||
* Conclusion | |||
** Grammar mistakes, look over | |||
*Testing results | |||
*Discussion | |||
*Lessons learned | |||
*Next steps | |||
*Troubleshooting | |||
*Team | |||
*References | |||
** Looks good |
Revision as of 05:45, 27 April 2015
- Be sure to use the format used when linking names: refer to background section
- In literature review add some writing to link ideas and evidence together, not just listing evidence in quotations
Feedback sections/template
Nice work so far. See below for comments on some sections:
- Refer to format listed on this link http://www.appropedia.org/Engineering_305/Project_template_and_grading
- Abstract
- sentence structure needs improvement
- Background
- Good section just add that it was in the Spring 2015 semester
- Add some information about northern California and where Humboldt State is located
- Problem statement
- Criteria
- weighted criteria table should be in descending order of importance
- Look over the constraints for maintainability, ease of use, and educational value once more
- Literature Review
- Make sure to put this section before the timeline and after criteria
- Add some own discussion of information found instead of listing resources you have found
- Construction
- Include more detail in construction steps.
- Number steps
- Make sure to include this after literature review and before timeline
- Timeline
- Center timeline table on the screen
- Costs
- Be sure to include the total spent compared to the actual cost in table
- Operation
- Include link to MEOW page as well as brief table of steps explaining its operation
- Maintenance
- Include this section
- Schedule
- Not listed
- Instructions
- Include a table of instructions described on this link http://www.appropedia.org/Engineering_305/Project_template_and_grading
- Conclusion
- Grammar mistakes, look over
- Testing results
- Discussion
- Lessons learned
- Next steps
- Troubleshooting
- Team
- References
- Looks good