Shapoklyak (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Shapoklyak (talk | contribs) (Emissions) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Emissions and their reduction== | ==Emissions and their reduction== | ||
The {{CO2}} emissions for a single conference trip were estimated to 7% of an average individual’s total {{CO2}} emissions. | |||
The total emissions of scientists travelling to conferences for presenting papers were estimated to 0.228% of international aviation emissions in 2008.<ref name="sl13"/> | |||
In a case study of a PhD project, mobility represented 75% of the carbon footprint, which could have been reduced by 44% using videoconferencing. The total emissions were 21.5t {{CO2}}-eq or 2.69t {{CO2}}-eq per peer-reviewed paper.<ref name="aam13"/> | In a case study of a PhD project, mobility represented 75% of the carbon footprint, which could have been reduced by 44% using videoconferencing. The total emissions were 21.5t {{CO2}}-eq or 2.69t {{CO2}}-eq per peer-reviewed paper.<ref name="aam13"/> | ||
Line 15: | Line 18: | ||
{{Reflist|refs= | {{Reflist|refs= | ||
<ref name="aam13">{{cite journal | last=Achten | first=Wouter M.J. | last2=Almeida | first2=Joana | last3=Muys | first3=Bart | title=Carbon footprint of science: More than flying | journal=Ecological Indicators | publisher=Elsevier BV | volume=34 | year=2013 | issn=1470-160X | doi=10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.05.025 | pages=352–355}}</ref> | <ref name="aam13">{{cite journal | last=Achten | first=Wouter M.J. | last2=Almeida | first2=Joana | last3=Muys | first3=Bart | title=Carbon footprint of science: More than flying | journal=Ecological Indicators | publisher=Elsevier BV | volume=34 | year=2013 | issn=1470-160X | doi=10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.05.025 | pages=352–355}}</ref> | ||
<ref name="sl13">{{cite journal | last=Spinellis | first=Diomidis | last2=Louridas | first2=Panos | editor-last=Bohrer | editor-first=Gil | title=The Carbon Footprint of Conference Papers | journal=PLoS ONE | publisher=Public Library of Science (PLoS) | volume=8 | issue=6 | date=2013-06-26 | issn=1932-6203 | doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0066508 | page=e66508}}</ref> | |||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Air travel]] | [[Category:Air travel]] | ||
[[Category:Academia]] | [[Category:Academia]] |
Revision as of 23:20, 7 February 2020
Air travel is an essential part of the professional lives of many academics, and a major source of pollution from that sector. In the context of the climate crisis, there have been appeals to reduce air travel by replacing it with other modes of transportation, replacing it with videoconferencing, or renouncing inessential trips.
Role of air travel in academia
Attitudes of academics
Emissions and their reduction
The Template:CO2 emissions for a single conference trip were estimated to 7% of an average individual’s total Template:CO2 emissions. The total emissions of scientists travelling to conferences for presenting papers were estimated to 0.228% of international aviation emissions in 2008.[1]
In a case study of a PhD project, mobility represented 75% of the carbon footprint, which could have been reduced by 44% using videoconferencing. The total emissions were 21.5t Template:CO2-eq or 2.69t Template:CO2-eq per peer-reviewed paper.[2]