The simple life can be an appealing idea, especially to those living in a city or suburb, detached from nature.
The reality is that living in a traditional way, close to nature, can be extremely complex. Consider this description of how to make a cup of tea in rural Afghanistan.
Technology can save time and effort, and yet technology has not meant simplicity and leisure for modern city-dwellers. A useful perspective is that of "intermediate technology" - this has almost the same meaning as appropriate technology as appropriate technology, with an emphasis on using some technological advancement, but not too much.
For example, having a series of devices or a service that provides clean water to a tap in your house is great and makes life simpler, in practice, and could be considered intermediate technology. Buying small bottles of water for a dollar or more each gives no greater benefit but involves greater consumption, waste of valuable resources and pollution.
In a rural context, threshers, tractors (or chicken tractors), deep wells and water filters could be considered intermediate technologies - all improving the quality of life, and reducing both the tedious simplicity (or monotony) of poor rural life, and reducing the complexity involved in getting the necessities and basic luxuries of life.
Observations on simple living, from Rural Architecture by Lewis Falley Allen, 1852:
See Simple living/Rural Architecture for a more complete extract and link to the full text on Project Gutenberg.
Crap you do not need - from the Age/SMH (Australian newpaper) blog All Men Are Liars
Self Sufficiency Guide to living more sustainably.
| License | CC-BY-SA-3.0 |
|---|---|
| Cite as | Chriswaterguy (2006–2025). "Voluntary simplicity". Appropedia. Retrieved October 3, 2026. |