Publication data
Type Paper
Title Towards Distributed Recycling with Additive Manufacturing of PET Flake Feedstocks
Year 2020
Language English (en)
License CC-BY-SA-4.0
Cite as Little, H.A.; Tanikella, N.G.; J. Reich, M.; Fiedler, M.J.; Snabes, S.L.; Pearce, J.M. Towards Distributed Recycling with Additive Manufacturing of PET Flake Feedstocks. Materials 2020, 13, 4273.,https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194273 open access preprint
Project data
Authors Little H.A.
Tanikella N.G.
J. Reich M.
Fiedler M.J.
Snabes S.L.
Joshua M. Pearce
Location The following coordinate was not recognized: Geocoding failed.Michigan, USA
Status Designed
Modelled
Prototyped
Verified
Verified by MOST
re:3D
Links https://www.academia.edu/44181380/Towards_Distributed_Recycling_with_Additive_Manufacturing_of_PET_Flake_Feedstocks&#124
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/19/4273%7C MDPI.com]
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202007.0707/v1&#124
OKH Manifest Download
Device data
Design files https://osf.io/q2bkd/
Hardware license CERN-OHL-S
Certifications Start OSHWA certification

This study explores the potential to reach a circular economy for post-consumer Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (rPET) packaging and bottles by using it as a Distributed Recycling for Additive Manufacturing (DRAM) feedstock. Specifically, for the first time, rPET water bottle flake is processed using only an open source toolchain with Fused Particle Fabrication (FPF) or Fused Granular Fabrication (FGF) processing rather than first converting it to filament. In this study, first the impact of granulation, sifting, and heating (and their sequential combination) is quantified on the shape and size distribution of the rPET flakes. Then 3D printing tests were performed on the rPET flake with two different feed systems: an external feeder and feed tube augmented with a motorized auger screw, and an extruder-mounted hopper that enables direct 3D printing. Two Gigabot X machines were used, each with the different feed systems, and one without and the latter with extended part cooling. 3D print settings were optimized based on thermal characterization, and both systems were shown to 3D print rPET directly from shredded water bottles. Mechanical testing showed the importance of isolating rPET from moisture and that geometry was important for uniform extrusion. The mechanical strength of 3D-printed parts with FPF and inconsistent flow is lower than optimized fused filament, but adequate for a wide range of applications. Future work is needed to improve consistency and enable water bottles to be used as a widespread DRAM feedstock.

Keywords

polymers; recycling; waste plastic; upcycle; circular economy; PET; additive manufacturing; distributed recycling; 3D printing; open-source appropriate technology; [Circular economy]]; Polymer recycling; Sustainable development; distributed manufacturing; life cycle analysis; recycling; 3-D printing; Open source hardware; Open hardware; RepRap; Recycling; Polymers; Plastic; Recyclebot; Waste plastic; Composites; Polymer composites; Extruder; Upcycle; Materials science;additive manufacturing; waste plastic; extruder; upcycle

==Helen on re:3D's Material Testing==
mqdefault.jpgYouTube_icon.svg
For more advanced and faster printer optimization see: Finding Ideal Parameters for Recycled Material Fused Particle Fabrication-Based 3D Printing Using an Open Source Software Implementation of Particle Swarm Optimization

In the news

See also

RepRapable Recyclebot and the Wild West of Recycling

mqdefault.jpgYouTube_icon.svg
mqdefault.jpgYouTube_icon.svg

Recycling Technology

Distributed Recycling LCA

Literature Reviews

Externals