This is intended as an information resource for those making the most of old computers, or choosing a new computer and software for the lowest possible cost. The needs of developing world users (language, maintenance, power, dust) in particular are considered, but the guide may be useful to people anywhere.
Remember that there is generally more than one acceptable solution; more controversial statements or disagreements may be best placed on the talk page. The ultimate aim is not to advocate particular hardware or software, but rather to meet the needs of people with limited resources, limited or no access to technical support, and/or limited education.
This is meant as a resource for those wishing to build low cost computers, suitable for developing countries, and for those wanting to reuse old computers or computer parts. The hardware choices are more relevant to new computers (or new parts) but the software choices apply to both.
It describes the choices available, depending on desired features such as:
There are several projects to develop and sell a low cost computer for the developing world. These are not yet ready, although the XO-1 (laptop)W is planned for release in early 2008.
For more information, see the Wikipedia articles for these projects:
There are a number of organizations who work in this field, taking old computers and setting them up for use by disadvantaged people. E.g.:
Since some years computers have enough resources to be used by more than one user ( even using a graphical interface ). What is needed is one or more graphic cards supporting more than one monitor and some USB keyboards and mice.
The main focus of this page (so far) is on desktop systems, and on reusing old computers, whether desktop or laptop. In terms of portable solutions, it will probably be hard to compete with the XO-1 (laptop)W.
However, feel free to contribute information on portability, in the appropriate sections.
Any moving parts will be particularly vulnerable.
If a conventional computer system is used, damage can be reduced by:
For computers using mains power, low power consumption is still best:
Low usage options
The XO-1 (laptop)W is planned to use 1 W of power or less. This is a great boon where power is limited or expensive.
However, in many contexts, where mains power is available, moderate power consumption is not a big problem, and it may not be worth the hardware cost to use ultra-low power consumption items.
Battery
While less than ideal from an environmental point of view (particularly where recycling options are not available), battery storage adds considerably to a computer's utility when used outdoors or with intermittent sources of power. Since batteries are also expensive, a computer with low power consumption is probably preferable to having more battery capacity. Many battery types also lose capacity over time, a process that can be accelerated by certain patterns of charging and discharging depending on the battery type.
One problem in locating new or used replacement batteries for laptops and similar devices is that most manufacturers will use a custom/proprietary form factor that prevents cross-compatibility with other brands and model lines. Norhtec's low-cost Gecko laptop uses eight standard AA sized rechargeable cells instead, eliminating the need to find a battery specifically designed for the device. Because of the broader market for standard battery types, prices can likely be more competitive.
To restore battery functionality to a laptop with a dead battery that has a non-standard form factor, it's possible to construct an external battery by wiring enough individual cells in series to create the voltage needed, and connecting that to the computer's DC input. With AA batteries this can be done with very inexpensive parts, but charging the cells in place would require additional circuitry. Power input jacks are much more likely to be of a standard type than the battery of the laptop, increasing the odds they will be available locally and inexpensively. Another method of restoring function would be to disassemble the original battery and replace the dead internal cells with functioning ones of the same number and type. This may be preferable if charging during operation is required.
| Options | Cost | Power output | Operating time |
|---|---|---|---|
Local energy production methods can be intermittent, which presents restrictions on usability if no power storage at all is in place. (#Crank power) is not unpredictable in the same way that {[solar power|solar]] or wind) power can be, but without any form of power storage the computer would turn off the instant you stopped cranking. Needing to generate power constantly to prevent immediate shutdown would make it considerably more difficult to use a hand-cranked computer since the hands are also needed for other tasks, but with foot/pedal power this would not be as much of an issue.
Crank power
The XO-1 (laptop)W is likely to have an optional hand-crank or foot-pedal, which will be a separate unit (to avoid damage to the computer by the physical stresses of cranking).
(Make Table - cost, speed, suitable o/s)
The CPU is a major factor in a computer's speed, power consumption and software compatibility. The clock rate W of a processor in MHz or GHz gives only a very rough idea of its capabilities unless comparing similar models, so it may be better to rely on real world tests to determine whether the system can perform a given task adequately. In some cases, processor intensive tasks (e.g. video decoding) can be offloaded to other components of the computer, allowing unbroken playback when otherwise the CPU alone might be unable to keep up.
Generally, recently made processors often have better power efficiency than older models, due both to miniaturization of components and active power saving measures not present in earlier chips. Used systems can have a low initial cost, but a power-hungry used model may present a false economy, depending on the cost of electricity and the amount of time it will be in use. Over time this will be less of a problem as inexpensive power-efficient models reach the used market at progressively lower prices.
Processors based on the X86 W architecture are found in most personal computers that exist now, which generally means broad compatibility with available operating systems and other software. Current X86 processor model lines with low power consumption include AMD's GeodeW and VIA's C7W, both seen in different revisions of the OLPC-XO, and Intel's Atom W line which is found in many consumer netbooks.
ARM W based processors are another low-powered option if X86 compatibility is not considered essential. Processors of this family are frequently seen in phones and other handheld devices, but inexpensive laptops with processors and tablet computers with ARM processors also exist. Power consumption can be significantly lower than comparable X86 chips, but running most commercial software designed for X86 systems (e.g. a full Windows OS) is not ordinarily possible. This is less of an issue with open source software and operating systems, because an ARM version can be compiled by someone from the source code and redistributed.
Is a Geode (processor)W suitable? Low power, used in Embedded systemW.
Unless otherwise stated, the drives shown are for desktop systems.
| Drive type | Cost (retail) | Cost (bulk) | Energy usage | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | Allows information distribution by CD (a useful development & education tool) | Info distribution is often by DVD now. | |||
| CD-RW (read-write) | Allows users to share information more easily. | ||||
| DVD | Allows information distribution by DVD or CD (a useful development & education tool) | Expense? | |||
| DVD-RW | Allows users to share information more easily. | Expense? |
Prices of CD and DVD drives and recordable media have declined to the point where there is no longer much of a price advantage to the older CD format either per disc or per drive. DVD drives are backwards compatible with the CD format, and DVD-RW drives also retain CD-RW write capabilities. In both cases, rewritable discs are more expensive than ordinary recordable discs that can only be written once, making them best suited to applications where the contents are only needed temporarily (e.g. testing). Since DVD discs hold many times more data than CDs but don't cost significantly more, the primary advantage of CD-R media today is playback on devices like audio CD players. Some audio CD players, particularly older models, are not able to play CD-R media though.
DVD drives and media come in a confusing array of varieties. Most notably, some drives will record to DVD-R but not DVD+R discs or vice versa, and some are unable to write to higher capacity dual layer media. Conversion of other video file formats to DVD can require a lot of time on a computer that's not moderately recent, and importing video from a source like VHS requires special hardware. DVD-RAM is a specialized disc format not compatible with stand alone DVD players.
Blu-ray has emerged as a successor to the DVD format, except in China where a variant of the competing HD-DVD disc format is still in use. Disc capacities are many times those of DVD media. As of 2011 there are significant premiums on Blu-ray drives and recordable media compared to DVD, but these have gradually diminished over time.
The cheapest option will often be second-hand monitors.
Cathode Ray TubeW monitors will most often be cheaper and more accesible than LCDW monitors. Be warned, however, of the risks in accepting free CRTs. You may end up with a dead monitor and a recycling fee.
Some brands to look for:
New monitor options for desktops
Low-cost; low power consumption is better if possible. What are the options?
The main options for storage are:
The XO-1 (laptop)W has no hard disk, using a (flash drive instead? how is data stored between sessions?)
Some Linux systems (see below) require as little as 4 MB of RAM - though more obviously gives more options and better function.
(Note - this table is based on my limited knowledge, and may not be correct - please help improve it.)
| Type of RAM | Full Name | Speeds available (MHz) | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRAM | Dynamic RAM | ?? | Cheaper. Lower power requirement? (Used for XO-1). | Slower (but this not a big problem when running a very efficient operating system and software). |
| SDRAM | Synchronous Dynamic RAM | 66, 100, 133 (Also referred to as PC66, etc) | Faster, often easy to find used. | More expensive, due to low manufacturing and supply |
| DDR SDRAM | Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic RAM | 266, 333, 400 (Also referred to as DDR266, etc) | Cheaper than single data rate SDRAM, available in larger capacities. Possible to install Dual ChannelW on some motherboards for additional performance. | Requires newer motherboard and processor. |
The requirements for software are:
Distributions of Linux typically include a range of applications. "Chubby Puppy Linux" includes more highly functional programs than most "MiniLinux" distributions, including OpenOffice, though it is slightly bigger at 96 MB. Additional suitable software may be found by following these links:
The requirements for an operating system are:
Windows
Windows is the best known system; however, we don't want to spend this much money, even if we have a computer which can run Windows.
Pirate versions are common in some developing countries, but:
Windows also is more resource-hungry, less reliable and stable than Linux.
Windows XP is not supported by Microsoft any more (as of April 2014).
Windows 7 and 8 require 2 GB (= 2000 MB) of RAM and modern processors for useful
operation. Therefore, these Windows versions are no alternative for older computers
with 256 MB of RAM to 2 GB of RAM. To continue using those computers instead of having
them become electronic waste, an efficient Linux distribution like Lubuntu Linux (from
256 MB of RAM) is a good replacement for Windows XP.
See How-tos: "Installation Tips: How to replace Windows XP with Lubuntu Linux" (PDF)
Windows 98/ME (not supported by Microsoft any more) seems to be able to run Open Source applications faster than Linux on old hardware. Was also able to get more large Open Source applications to run on a Windows ME machine than on a Linux machine with a distribution geared to older systems (on the same computer).[expansion needed] My source for this was my own experience. I used a laptop running Windows ME and later on the same one running Linux, ran the same Open Source applications and saw a speed difference. I've also seen this mentioned on a few Linux blogs by users who run both operating systems. -- comment by anonymous contributor. With that in mind, ReactOS might be a good future solution (but is currently alpha, not suitable for everyday use . ReactOS is an Open Source operating system attempting to be compatible with Windows NT (and future versions) and to give compatibility with Windows native drivers, while using much less system resources.
Linux
Using a lightweight version of Linux specially designed for older computers may be the best option. Even 486 machines can run with some of these, although without a modern browser with flash etc. There is a wide choice of Linux flavors, called "distributions", which can be confusing to the newbie.
Linux is also Free Software Free softwareW (also known as FLOSS FOSS (see: LibreW).
As of March, 2014, Lubuntu Linux (from 256 MB of RAM) is one of the best lightweight Linux versions available and a very easy to install replacement for Windows XP.
See How-tos: "Installation Tips: How to replace Windows XP with Lubuntu Linux" (PDF)
How to choose a Linux distro
MorphOS
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
These are not essential, but would be a plus:
Software that works on older computers: (These work on Linux and Windows unless noted.)
An important part of minimizing maintenance problems and ensuring reliable operation is keeping the computer safe from virusesW and other security risks.
If you are using Linux or Apple, your system is relatively secure to start with. However, basic security measures should still be followed.
Windows machines are prone to security problems, and this must be taken very seriously. It is very strongly recommended that the system be hardened, i.e. made more secure.
The most essential steps include:
All these things can be done at zero cost by choosing free software and using free guides where needed.
This is just a start - see the links below for more info.
More information:
In order to make the most of older equipment, it is valuable to tweak the system, using certain low-risk methods.
One simple method in Windows XPW is to change the setting
More information:
To help keep in touch with similar projects.
| License | CC-BY-SA-3.0 |
|---|---|
| Cite as | Chriswaterguy, Loil, Nurmagister, Writtenonsand, Curtbeckmann (2006–2026). "Low cost computer guide". Appropedia. Retrieved October 3, 2026. |