Difference between revisions of "Category:Open source"

From Appropedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added singkong2005 as topic admin)
(switched to needtopic admin, although this topic is a much smaller subset of Category:Information_and_communication_technology so maybe we should try to fill that positiion first)
Line 23: Line 23:
See also [[Wikipedia:Open design]]
See also [[Wikipedia:Open design]]

Revision as of 18:56, 15 October 2006

Template:Wikipedia Template:Browsetopic

Open source and development issues

It is highly advisable that "Open source" licences such as the GNU Free Documentation License (read text) be considered for all written material and software related to development.

This allows free use and distribution of the material (free as in freedom, and free beer) and prevents people from being charged for the material. (Note that under many licences it is allowable to charge people for the cost of distribution, but not to impose any additional restrictions on what the person does with it.)

A relevant example is the ceramic water filter, which was deliberately not patented, to avoid restrictions on people wanting to use the design. Though thought must also be given to ensuring that no one else will patent it. (It may be that if the design and use of the invention is clearly documented, that will prevent others from being able to claim it as their own...?)

Open source software

There are many examples, including:


  • Project Gutenberg - are there texts here relevant to development? (Educational texts, texts for use by English learners?)

Open source projects related to development

See also Wikipedia:Open design

This topic needs a topic expert


This category has the following 12 subcategories, out of 12 total.

Pages in category "Open source"

The following 40 pages are in this category, out of 40 total.