Warning! You are not logged in. Log in or create an account to have your edits attributed to your username rather than your IP, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 106: Line 106:
In an intermeshing twin-screw extruder with the co-rotating screws, the extruded material is more evenly mixed and spends less time in the extrusion barrel than its single-screw counterpart. This decrease in dwell time is caused by an increase the material's speed down the barrel, which is allowed due to the elimination of back pressure.<ref name="Wolcott & Englund" /> Back pressure{{W|Back pressure}} is present in single-screw extruders because of the friction forces created by the screw. The utilization of two screws in this intermeshing extruder eliminates backpressure by displacing the material using the screws themselves and not friction.<ref name="Wolcott & Englund" /> This increase in material speed allows for a smaller energy input during forming and lower material temperature rise during extrusion, which produces better material properties in the final product and increased energy efficiency.<ref name="Wolcott & Englund" /> Furthermore, this design allows for increase materials efficiency as no compounding process is required when this forming process is used, which means no material can be lost between processes.
In an intermeshing twin-screw extruder with the co-rotating screws, the extruded material is more evenly mixed and spends less time in the extrusion barrel than its single-screw counterpart. This decrease in dwell time is caused by an increase the material's speed down the barrel, which is allowed due to the elimination of back pressure.<ref name="Wolcott & Englund" /> Back pressure{{W|Back pressure}} is present in single-screw extruders because of the friction forces created by the screw. The utilization of two screws in this intermeshing extruder eliminates backpressure by displacing the material using the screws themselves and not friction.<ref name="Wolcott & Englund" /> This increase in material speed allows for a smaller energy input during forming and lower material temperature rise during extrusion, which produces better material properties in the final product and increased energy efficiency.<ref name="Wolcott & Englund" /> Furthermore, this design allows for increase materials efficiency as no compounding process is required when this forming process is used, which means no material can be lost between processes.


Despite the improvement in energy and materials efficiency, the twin-screw extruder is a very expensive upgrade from the single-screw extruder, causing many manufacturers to be hesitant towards using it. The economics that play into upgrading to this more efficient machine is discussed below.
Despite the improvement in energy and materials efficiency, the twin-screw extruder is a very expensive upgrade from the single-screw extruder. The economics that play into upgrading to this more efficient machine is discussed below.


== Economic Analysis of Implementing Wood-plastic Composite Products ==
== Economic Analysis of Implementing Wood-plastic Composite Products ==
Warning! All contributions to Appropedia are released under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license unless otherwise noted (see Appropedia:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here! You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted material without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.