The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1,466: | Line 1,466: | ||
:Hi, guys. I added a link to [http://www.forum-software.org/ Forum Software Reviews] as a handy way to learn more about and [http://www.forum-software.org/forum-comparator compare] forum software. An additional option not reviewed but discussed is [http://www.smfnew.com/ SMFNEW]. I would have used that for Next Steps, except the chat room is busted and our charter members are a bit chatty. That group came mostly from [http://web.archive.org/web/20201203103934/https://www.kivafriends.org/ Kiva Friends] that uses the server version of Small Machines forum software. Regards, [[User:RichardF|RichardF]] 08:00, 8 April 2011 (PDT) | :Hi, guys. I added a link to [http://www.forum-software.org/ Forum Software Reviews] as a handy way to learn more about and [http://www.forum-software.org/forum-comparator compare] forum software. An additional option not reviewed but discussed is [http://www.smfnew.com/ SMFNEW]. I would have used that for Next Steps, except the chat room is busted and our charter members are a bit chatty. That group came mostly from [http://web.archive.org/web/20201203103934/https://www.kivafriends.org/ Kiva Friends] that uses the server version of Small Machines forum software. Regards, [[User:RichardF|RichardF]] 08:00, 8 April 2011 (PDT) | ||
::What do we need to discuss about Appropedia that we cannot discuss on Appropedia? --[[User:Teratornis|Teratornis]] 12:58, 8 April 2011 (PDT) | ::What do we need to discuss about Appropedia that we cannot discuss on Appropedia? --[[User:Teratornis|Teratornis]] 12:58, 8 April 2011 (PDT) | ||
:::Teratornis, By Appropedia do you mean the wiki? --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 22:05, 8 April 2011 (PDT) | :::Teratornis, By Appropedia do you mean the wiki? --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 22:05, 8 April 2011 (PDT) | ||
::::Yes. [[wikipedia:Appropedia]] defines "Appropedia" as the wiki. That's what I've always thought of as "Appropedia". If that usage is ambiguous, someone should update the Wikipedia article. I see there is also an [http://blogs.appropedia.org/ Appropedia blog]. I'm not familiar with it; I don't see that it has a separate discussion feature. Is there something else called (just) "Appropedia" that is distinct from the wiki? --[[User:Teratornis|Teratornis]] 22:55, 8 April 2011 (PDT) | ::::Yes. [[wikipedia:Appropedia]] defines "Appropedia" as the wiki. That's what I've always thought of as "Appropedia". If that usage is ambiguous, someone should update the Wikipedia article. I see there is also an [http://blogs.appropedia.org/ Appropedia blog]. I'm not familiar with it; I don't see that it has a separate discussion feature. Is there something else called (just) "Appropedia" that is distinct from the wiki? --[[User:Teratornis|Teratornis]] 22:55, 8 April 2011 (PDT) |