m (→‎Project: new section)
(→‎Peer Review: new section)
Line 27: Line 27:


--[[User:J.M.Pearce|Joshua]] 16:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
--[[User:J.M.Pearce|Joshua]] 16:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
== Peer Review ==
Hey Chris. It's Michael de Souza. Sorry it took me so long to get started on the review of your project page. I apologize and I'm going to be working on it today (Wednesday) and putting any final comments in tomorrow. I read the content on your page and I think you did a good job at explaining how both the system and actual process works for MBE. I'll read it over a few more times, along with the wikipedia article on MBE.
Just a couple comments on grammar and format for now:
- I also still have to do this with my project page; I think it'll be a good idea to place references/links to wikipedia throughout your article. For instance, you mention Boltzman's constant; it would be useful to link it to the Wikipedia article on Boltzman's constant. I myself am not exactly sure how to do this but as soon as I bring up the "how to" I'll post it here for you.
- There was one sentence under the heading Substrate Stage:
"Upon the substrate holder is placed a material upon which the beams are to interact and the source material is to be deposited"
I guess you could rewrite that to sound something like
"A material, on which the beams interact and source material is deposited, is placed upon the substrate holder."
- Also I'm not sure how strict he is about this, but I remember I was talking to Pearce earlier on in the semester about references and he told me I should try reference sources from as recent as possible. Just because I noticed that your patents are from 93 and 2000. But like I said I don't know how he will approach this.
I'll add more here if I find anything else. All in all though, great job man.
Peace
Michael

Revision as of 16:41, 19 November 2008

Welcome!

Appropedia-logo.jpg

Hi C.Cochrane,

Welcome to the Appropedia wiki. Please make yourself at home! If you need a general wiki-tutorial, see the main help page (or the more in-depth one on WikiEducator).

Check your preferences and be sure you verify your email address and turn on email notification if you'd like it -- you can find out when your talk page, or any page on your watchlist, is modified. You may want to upload a photo or information about yourself to your userpage (which is at http://appropedia.org/User:C.Cochrane).

If you have a particular interest or project in mind, go ahead and start it! If you have questions or suggestions, the best place to leave them is at the Village pump - you should get a fast response. Or, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page if you have further questions, need help finding your way around, have a cool idea for a project, or just want to chat.

Glad to have you here!

-solidally

Project

Great beginning.

Recommendations:

  • Formatting: tie into appropedia with hyperlinks, also wikipedia defs.,. use existing site resources to explain basic concepts
  • Content: you need to get into the peer reviewed literature in a major way - MBE is well established - lots of work has been done on process improvements, after a complete review - choose one of them and then quantify the improvements to efficiency.

--Joshua 16:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Peer Review

Hey Chris. It's Michael de Souza. Sorry it took me so long to get started on the review of your project page. I apologize and I'm going to be working on it today (Wednesday) and putting any final comments in tomorrow. I read the content on your page and I think you did a good job at explaining how both the system and actual process works for MBE. I'll read it over a few more times, along with the wikipedia article on MBE.

Just a couple comments on grammar and format for now:

- I also still have to do this with my project page; I think it'll be a good idea to place references/links to wikipedia throughout your article. For instance, you mention Boltzman's constant; it would be useful to link it to the Wikipedia article on Boltzman's constant. I myself am not exactly sure how to do this but as soon as I bring up the "how to" I'll post it here for you.

- There was one sentence under the heading Substrate Stage: "Upon the substrate holder is placed a material upon which the beams are to interact and the source material is to be deposited"

I guess you could rewrite that to sound something like "A material, on which the beams interact and source material is deposited, is placed upon the substrate holder."

- Also I'm not sure how strict he is about this, but I remember I was talking to Pearce earlier on in the semester about references and he told me I should try reference sources from as recent as possible. Just because I noticed that your patents are from 93 and 2000. But like I said I don't know how he will approach this.

I'll add more here if I find anything else. All in all though, great job man.

Peace Michael

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.