(thank you and notes on bicycling) |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-(?s)sustainability(.*$) +sustainability\1)) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi Baron, | Hi Baron, | ||
Thank you for your creation of the [[Bicycle]] page. I have made this [[Bicycle]] page into a redirect to the [[:Category: | Thank you for your creation of the [[Bicycle]] page. I have made this [[Bicycle]] page into a redirect to the [[:Category:Cycling]] page, and moved your content to its talk page. Now editors can link directly to Bicycle, and when appropriate include their page in the Category:Cycling. | ||
Thank you, | Thank you, | ||
--[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 18:36, 13 February 2007 (PST) | --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 18:36, 13 February 2007 (PST) | ||
== times are changing == | |||
[[public perspective of enviromentalism]] | |||
[[User:Baron|Baron]] 12:09, 20 March 2007 (PDT) | |||
== Naming == | |||
Hi Baron, | |||
Thanks for your input - good to have you here. | |||
Just one small thing - article names don't use capitals apart from the first letter, unless they're proper names. (We're following Wikipedia policy). | |||
Btw, there's something I'd like your thoughts on: I'm wondering about how to tag articles like [[Public perspective of enviromentalism]], in terms of the name and the categorization. It partly depends whether we go down the route of opinion pieces, or develop them more as analytical pieces. Let me know your thoughts. Cheers --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] · <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 20:40, 2 April 2007 (PDT) | |||
== Boeing == | |||
Re [[Boeing]], "Boeing is now looking into biojetfuel." - That's good news. Do you have a good source for this? At least a news report, and a more detailed link if possible, would be great. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] · <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 20:29, 3 May 2007 (PDT) | |||
== Big Green from being green == | |||
[[Big Green from being green]] contains only a dead link - do you have information to add, or should we delete the page? | |||
Regarding [[Jon Tester]], that looks more like a topic for a Wikipedia article - did you have plans to add more info to that, that would be valuable for Appropedia but not suitable for Wikipedia? Thanks. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] · <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 14:58, 3 November 2007 (PDT) | |||
==Water and heroes== | |||
That's a very good [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/27/us/27conserve.html?ex=1196830800&en=31b07f93027bcff8&ei=5065&partner=MYWAY link] you added re water recycling. | |||
I've been meaning to answer your comment on my talk page re needing heroes, but have been completely hectic. Agreed that examples and role models are good. What would be worthwhile would be some information about these people, about the [[sustainability]] related work they've done - their farms, what they did to advance sustainability, etc. The sort of information we don't get at Wikipedia. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] · <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 11:25, 1 December 2007 (PST) | |||
I'd do what I can 8) 16:05, 2 December 2007 (PST)[[User:Baron|Baron]] | |||
Revision as of 17:33, 11 August 2008
Hi Baron,
Thank you for your creation of the Bicycle page. I have made this Bicycle page into a redirect to the Category:Cycling page, and moved your content to its talk page. Now editors can link directly to Bicycle, and when appropriate include their page in the Category:Cycling.
Thank you, --Lonny 18:36, 13 February 2007 (PST)
times are changing
public perspective of enviromentalism
Baron 12:09, 20 March 2007 (PDT)
Naming
Hi Baron,
Thanks for your input - good to have you here.
Just one small thing - article names don't use capitals apart from the first letter, unless they're proper names. (We're following Wikipedia policy).
Btw, there's something I'd like your thoughts on: I'm wondering about how to tag articles like Public perspective of enviromentalism, in terms of the name and the categorization. It partly depends whether we go down the route of opinion pieces, or develop them more as analytical pieces. Let me know your thoughts. Cheers --Chriswaterguy · talk 20:40, 2 April 2007 (PDT)
Boeing
Re Boeing, "Boeing is now looking into biojetfuel." - That's good news. Do you have a good source for this? At least a news report, and a more detailed link if possible, would be great. --Chriswaterguy · talk 20:29, 3 May 2007 (PDT)
Big Green from being green
Big Green from being green contains only a dead link - do you have information to add, or should we delete the page?
Regarding Jon Tester, that looks more like a topic for a Wikipedia article - did you have plans to add more info to that, that would be valuable for Appropedia but not suitable for Wikipedia? Thanks. --Chriswaterguy · talk 14:58, 3 November 2007 (PDT)
Water and heroes
That's a very good link you added re water recycling.
I've been meaning to answer your comment on my talk page re needing heroes, but have been completely hectic. Agreed that examples and role models are good. What would be worthwhile would be some information about these people, about the sustainability related work they've done - their farms, what they did to advance sustainability, etc. The sort of information we don't get at Wikipedia. --Chriswaterguy · talk 11:25, 1 December 2007 (PST)
I'd do what I can 8) 16:05, 2 December 2007 (PST)Baron