No edit summary |
m (Lonny moved page User:Ethan~appropedia to User:Ethan over redirect) |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Userboxtop}} | |||
{{userbox tasks}} | |||
{{User perma}} | |||
{{User food}} | |||
{{user sca|This user}} | |||
{{Template: User Deutsch}} | |||
{{User Linux}} | |||
{{User porting helper}} | |||
{{Userboxbottom}} | |||
[[Image:Nested sustainability-v2.png|thumb|right|300px]] | |||
[[Appropedia: | Hi, I'm an Appropedia [[Appropedia:Administrators|admin]]. Sustainability matters are mostly an avocational interest for me at the present. My focus is on permaculture-related topics. There's so much great information out there that I want to make easily available. | ||
If you need my help send me a message on my talk page or [[Appropedia:IRC|IRC]]. | |||
== What I do on Appropedia == | |||
* Monitor new articles for spam | |||
* Port, write and organize content. | |||
* | |||
* | |||
See: my [[User:Ethan/Tasks|tasks page]] for more detail. | |||
* [ | == My favorite news sources == | ||
* [ | * [http://www.resilience.org/ Resilience.org] | ||
* [ | * [http://www.ecoshock.org/ Radio Ecoshock] | ||
* [ | * [http://www.permaculturenews.org Permaculture News] | ||
* [http://www.independentsciencenews.org/ Independent Science News] | |||
* | == Recommended reading == | ||
* | |||
* | * ''Earth User's Guide to Permaculture'' by Rosemary Morrow - possibly the best general introduction to permaculture | ||
* | * ''Permaculture: Principles and Pathways Beyond Sustainability'' by David Holmgren - best introduction to the theory underlying permaculture design | ||
* | * ''Peak Everything'' by Richard Heinberg - global natural resource depletion, its consequences and possible responses | ||
* ''Debt: The First 5000 Years'' by David Graeber - a sweeping survey of the role of debt and money in human societies | |||
* | * ''Mycelium Running'' by Paul Stamets - fungi are amazing and under-appreciated | ||
* | |||
* | == Recommended viewing == | ||
* | |||
* ''The Crisis of Civilization'' - a calm, but urgent, overview of the ecological and social realities confronting us | |||
* ''Inhabit: A Permaculture Perspective'' - best feature-length introduction to permaculture, surveying a diversity of landscapes and people in the USA | |||
* ''Global Gardener'' - mini-series in which Bill Mollison explores permaculture applications in arid, tropical, temperate and urban landscapes | |||
* ''First Earth: Uncompromising Ecological Architecture'' - '''the''' documentary on natural building | |||
== A permaculture wiki still makes sense == | |||
Over the last few months I have been building up the permaculture side of Appropedia. I haven't spent a lot of time thinking about why; it's intuitive to me. But now I'd like to briefly explain my motivations. | |||
Wikis are a collaborative endeavor. Folks in the permaculture community often emphasize cooperative efforts, but ironically very few such efforts have really been utilized on the Internet. Wikis have been far less popular than email lists and web forums. In some ways these approaches to information sharing make sense. They are better suited to spreading time-sensitive and locally-specific information. They can also be a good place to ask very specific questions. But they have their weaknesses, too. I've started to grow frustrated by the endless repetition of the same basic questions that I encounter on certain web forums. I've decided to make better use of my time than by repeating my answers. Perhaps the users who ask these questions are somewhat to blame for being too lazy to do a quick search through the archives. But as a permaculture practitioner I have to understand that the bigger issue is design. Discussion-based tools are just not well suited to sharing the basic and broad information that many people are looking for. Wikis are. | |||
The challenge now is that wikis seem to be a bit cliched. Or rather, they've become part of the background noise; taken for granted as part of the fabric of the Internet as much as search engines, or email. A decade ago wikis were a hot commodity. Wikipedia's sudden popularity created a rising tide of wikis. A decade later that tide has ebbed. Just here on Appropedia there is a noticeable decrease of timestamps from 2006 to 2015. So what this calls for is a change of strategy. We can no longer count on having an active userbase simply just because it's a substantially-sized wiki. | |||
Ever since I first got into permaculture around 2009, I wished for an easy, open-access, one-stop-shop for permaculture information. Such a resource still doesn't exist. Appropedia is the best-situated to become it. To that end I have been porting content from other derelict permaculture wikis. Once this is finished there will be a good foundation from which to expand. With consistent building of quality content, Appropedia will attract more users. A greater number of overall users will increase the number of editing users. I believe Appropedia can become one of the major permaculture websites. Indeed, I think we should move from envisioning Appropedia as ''the'' sustainability wiki, to becoming ''the'' action-oriented, community-powered sustainability website. --[[User:Ethan|Ethan]] ([[User talk:Ethan|talk]]) 20:04, 10 October 2015 (PDT) | |||
<!--- == Giving sustainability teeth== | |||
[[Image:Sustainable development.png|thumb|right|300px|Fig. 1: An incoherent model of sustainability]] | |||
[[Image:Nested sustainability-v2.png|thumb|right|300px|Fig. 2: A model of sustainability based on the real world]] | |||
::''draft version'' | |||
In recent years some people involved in the green scene have begun to re-evaluate the term "sustainability". In a general sense, "sustainable" just means something can be maintained indefinitely in more-or-less its present state. They advocate dropping sustainability in favor of "thrivability" or "resilience". I wouldn't mind adding these to our conceptual toolbox, though I'm hesitant to throw out sustainability. However, if it is to be salvaged, it does need major reworking if it will remain useful. | |||
Following several UN summits and commissions, the predomiant model of sustainability focuses on three areas: the environment, society, and the economy. These are presented as three overlapping circles; a Venn diagram (figure 1). Thus there are three "domains" that some issue or technique could belong to. It could fall under one, two, or all three domains. Think about that for a second. | |||
It is not even conceivable that something could happen in the social realm -- a cultural expression, a traditional food, a familiar relationship -- that isn't also entirely embedded in the environmental realm. After all, humans are animals. Likewise, it is impossible even imagine economics taking place outside of a social context. Many transactions these days are done automatically by computer, but they still take place within the patterns set down by human society. As Herman Daly put it, "what use is a sawmill without a forest?" | |||
When we move toward an integrated model of sustainability (figure 2) that recognizes society as embedded within ecology, and economics as a subsystem of human society, everything becomes much clearer. With this mental model ideas like externality, energy economics, social permaculture, and conservation suddenly make more sense. ---> | |||
[[Category:Porting helpers|{{PAGENAME}}]] | |||
Revision as of 05:14, 23 June 2017
Template:Userboxtop Template:Userbox tasks Template:User perma Template:User food Template:User sca Template:User Deutsch Template:User Linux Template:User porting helper Template:Userboxbottom
Hi, I'm an Appropedia admin. Sustainability matters are mostly an avocational interest for me at the present. My focus is on permaculture-related topics. There's so much great information out there that I want to make easily available.
If you need my help send me a message on my talk page or IRC.
What I do on Appropedia
- Monitor new articles for spam
- Port, write and organize content.
See: my tasks page for more detail.
My favorite news sources
Recommended reading
- Earth User's Guide to Permaculture by Rosemary Morrow - possibly the best general introduction to permaculture
- Permaculture: Principles and Pathways Beyond Sustainability by David Holmgren - best introduction to the theory underlying permaculture design
- Peak Everything by Richard Heinberg - global natural resource depletion, its consequences and possible responses
- Debt: The First 5000 Years by David Graeber - a sweeping survey of the role of debt and money in human societies
- Mycelium Running by Paul Stamets - fungi are amazing and under-appreciated
Recommended viewing
- The Crisis of Civilization - a calm, but urgent, overview of the ecological and social realities confronting us
- Inhabit: A Permaculture Perspective - best feature-length introduction to permaculture, surveying a diversity of landscapes and people in the USA
- Global Gardener - mini-series in which Bill Mollison explores permaculture applications in arid, tropical, temperate and urban landscapes
- First Earth: Uncompromising Ecological Architecture - the documentary on natural building
A permaculture wiki still makes sense
Over the last few months I have been building up the permaculture side of Appropedia. I haven't spent a lot of time thinking about why; it's intuitive to me. But now I'd like to briefly explain my motivations.
Wikis are a collaborative endeavor. Folks in the permaculture community often emphasize cooperative efforts, but ironically very few such efforts have really been utilized on the Internet. Wikis have been far less popular than email lists and web forums. In some ways these approaches to information sharing make sense. They are better suited to spreading time-sensitive and locally-specific information. They can also be a good place to ask very specific questions. But they have their weaknesses, too. I've started to grow frustrated by the endless repetition of the same basic questions that I encounter on certain web forums. I've decided to make better use of my time than by repeating my answers. Perhaps the users who ask these questions are somewhat to blame for being too lazy to do a quick search through the archives. But as a permaculture practitioner I have to understand that the bigger issue is design. Discussion-based tools are just not well suited to sharing the basic and broad information that many people are looking for. Wikis are.
The challenge now is that wikis seem to be a bit cliched. Or rather, they've become part of the background noise; taken for granted as part of the fabric of the Internet as much as search engines, or email. A decade ago wikis were a hot commodity. Wikipedia's sudden popularity created a rising tide of wikis. A decade later that tide has ebbed. Just here on Appropedia there is a noticeable decrease of timestamps from 2006 to 2015. So what this calls for is a change of strategy. We can no longer count on having an active userbase simply just because it's a substantially-sized wiki.
Ever since I first got into permaculture around 2009, I wished for an easy, open-access, one-stop-shop for permaculture information. Such a resource still doesn't exist. Appropedia is the best-situated to become it. To that end I have been porting content from other derelict permaculture wikis. Once this is finished there will be a good foundation from which to expand. With consistent building of quality content, Appropedia will attract more users. A greater number of overall users will increase the number of editing users. I believe Appropedia can become one of the major permaculture websites. Indeed, I think we should move from envisioning Appropedia as the sustainability wiki, to becoming the action-oriented, community-powered sustainability website. --Ethan (talk) 20:04, 10 October 2015 (PDT)