Public health or Health or Health and safety

Refs for public health section[1][2][3][4][5][6]
Disabilities
Diseases

CystsBacterias[7]Viruses

Health care by region
Health paradigms

Homeopathy • Aleopathy • Herbalism[8]

Human dignity in public health
Hygiene

Hand washing[9]Washing[10]

Medical storage

Refrigeration
Food refrigeration • Vaccine refrigeration

ORT[11]
Pest control

Mosquito control

Public safety

Ambulance • Earthquake preparedness
Fire response • Tsunami alert

Sanitation[12]

Composting toilets[13][14] Bucket • Double vaulted
Humanure • Pit latrines[15]Septic tanks

Waste management[16]

References

  1. begin HEALTH AND SAFETY refs
  2. "Health and safety"? Where to put various safety items? Under community? Note that "Health" already exists and has 13 members. Public health exists and has 8 members.
  3. I'm concerned about the value and liability of "treatment" articles. I would suggest a conservative policy in the treatment area, or huge disclaimers. Both, really.
    • I'm not sure how conservative you are thinking, but I'd like to major on the prominent disclaimer and restrict editing as little as possible. --Singkong2005 · talk 03:56, 15 January 2007 (PST)
  4. What to include? Cysts, bacteria, virus, but not broken bones, sprains, cuts, concussions, malnutrition, exposure, heat stroke, dehydration?
    • Some are obviously development-related, like malaria... but I wouldn't be inclined to categorize diseases by pathogen type (Cysts, Bacterias, Viruses) - not at this stage, anyway. We're focusing on the technology and practice of treatment on prevention, not on the biology of the pathogen.
    • I guess the aim here is to suggest likely topics, rather than define limits? To be honest, I'm actually not sure why we need this table at all, as opposed to just relying on the category structure (which would also save a lot of work, and avoid getting out of date)...
    If we end up having pages on appropriate technology casts for broken limbs, and suitable transport for people in a delicate condition (with broken bones or internal injuries) in rough, poor situations, then we we might think about having a category for those topics. --Singkong2005 · talk 03:56, 15 January 2007 (PST)
  5. Prevention and treatment are called out separately. What else is there? Description, diagnosis, prevalence, perhaps?
  6. I dropped specific diseases under "diseases, and implicitly raised "prevention and treatement" within each category to be included with categories as, say, Cysts.
  7. Bacteria is already plural right? And yet, my gut says adding the "s" is okay
  8. I wouldn't be making a fuss if someone added pages on these topics, but are they really part of Appropedia's focus? (Did Chris leave this?)
  9. Moved from Sanitation as agreed with Chris
  10. existing category(2)
  11. What is this? Is there a better label? Does it fit under something else?
  12. How is "wastewater treatment" distinct from Sanitation? Bigger? Smaller? Same?
  13. Need to change the name of the current category name by adding an "S".
  14. IMHO, the subcategories (bucket, double-vaulted) don't add value, can be added later. This is a recurring theme and needs to be addressed as a policy. Do we create empty or single-article categories and hope they grow? Meanwhile live with bunches of empty or near-empty categories, which seems annoying and seems to exaggerate gaps. Alternatively, we are forced to regularly create and expand categories, which has its own set of issues...
  15. Merged "improved pit latrines" into
  16. Is this solid was management, different from, say, wastewater treatment and sanitation?
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.