mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
--[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 12:03, 11 June 2006 (PDT) | --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 12:03, 11 June 2006 (PDT) | ||
== Clarification == | |||
Ahh, my mistake. I was refering to Category:Appropriate Technology. I still am not sure if that would be correct since it seems to be an encyclopedic collection of topics, not really intended for projects. Parras AT is for already implemented stuff that we encounter here, correct? | |||
If the projects have no other proper place, then I would agree Category:Parras Projects might be helpful for clarity. One concern would be how to manage projects from year to year. Category:Parras Projects [2006|2007|2008|etc..] would make it clear but might introduce unwanted redundancy (although it would be easy to alias ongoing projects, no?). | |||
And one more question about talk layout conventions. Is it preferable to have flat conversations, or to indent replies? For example, this would be indented to indicate my response, and yours would probably be indented from the original as well. | |||
--[[User:Kinzer|Kinzer]] 12:27, 11 June 2006 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:27, 11 June 2006
Question for Lonny
Should this page also be under the AT category?
--Kinzer 20:01, 10 June 2006 (PDT)
Categories
This project should probably go under a few other categories, such as:
Category:Solar Distillation
and eventually should be listed in the List_of_Projects
I am undecided about putting this project in Category:Parras AT. I like the idea of all of those Parras AT pages following a similar format... Maybe a Parras Projects category is in order. What do you think?
--Lonny 12:03, 11 June 2006 (PDT)
Clarification
Ahh, my mistake. I was refering to Category:Appropriate Technology. I still am not sure if that would be correct since it seems to be an encyclopedic collection of topics, not really intended for projects. Parras AT is for already implemented stuff that we encounter here, correct?
If the projects have no other proper place, then I would agree Category:Parras Projects might be helpful for clarity. One concern would be how to manage projects from year to year. Category:Parras Projects [2006|2007|2008|etc..] would make it clear but might introduce unwanted redundancy (although it would be easy to alias ongoing projects, no?).
And one more question about talk layout conventions. Is it preferable to have flat conversations, or to indent replies? For example, this would be indented to indicate my response, and yours would probably be indented from the original as well.
--Kinzer 12:27, 11 June 2006 (PDT)