Hi Baron,
Thank you for your energetic contributions. Regarding this recent addition of Pavement: Content on Appropedia pages should have a scientific basis and verifiability. Subjective statements do have a place, but that place is limited. Please see Appropedia:Analysis and Appropedia:Ruleset for some guidelines. In addition, Issuepedia is a great place to engage in opinion based discussions. Just stating that pavement is bad does not add any information. Please consider deleting this page, or adding in the information that brought you to your conclusion. For instance, a brief description of pavement followed by ==Pros==, ==Cons==, ==Alternatives== and ==See also== sections would be great.
Please let us know if that does not make sense or you disagree.
Thank you again for your interest and engagement, --Lonny 17:00, 22 April 2007 (PDT)
Start a discussion about Pavement
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Appropedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve Pavement.
