(==Who and what?==) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Also, is this planned to be a informal network, or something more formal? (I'd prefer informal, a kind of meeting point and round table for discussion.) --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] · <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 05:31, 3 January 2008 (PST) | Also, is this planned to be a informal network, or something more formal? (I'd prefer informal, a kind of meeting point and round table for discussion.) --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] · <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 05:31, 3 January 2008 (PST) | ||
Laura Miller just did an edit addressing grammar, format, and some layout. She had the following query dealing with Open Collaboration: | |||
#the feasibility of Open Collaboration <!-- Is this the name of an online platform? If so, it would be useful to include the link. If not, then open collaboration should not be capitalized -->has been demonstrated beyond doubt. | |||
As I read the page, it seems "Open Collaboration" is more of a concept than an application. | |||
Preston | |||
Revision as of 14:38, 2 September 2011
Who and what?
This page has been edited by 3 active Appropedians - should we label it as an Appropedia-initiated project, or say something like "initiated by Appropedia Curt Beckmann, and open to all"?
Also, is this planned to be a informal network, or something more formal? (I'd prefer informal, a kind of meeting point and round table for discussion.) --Chriswaterguy · talk 05:31, 3 January 2008 (PST)
Laura Miller just did an edit addressing grammar, format, and some layout. She had the following query dealing with Open Collaboration:
- the feasibility of Open Collaboration has been demonstrated beyond doubt.
As I read the page, it seems "Open Collaboration" is more of a concept than an application.
Preston