Tagging this page as needing to have contact details checked, and if necessary updated Joeturner 13:33, 7 February 2013 (PST)
- We haven't yet looked at the issue of how we handle contact details. Perhaps as a general rule they could be left in, each with a small tag saying not checked, or last checked on (date)... Those tags would be implemented with a template or templates, for ease and consistency. --Chriswaterguy 18:05, 7 February 2013 (PST)
- If I may be so bold as to suggest policy: information which contains outdated contact details is useless. Even if the source is originally from outside of appropedia, nobody can use the details if the contacts are wrong. Hence I believe they should be a) checked and b) updated. Joeturner 00:31, 8 February 2013 (PST)