Regarding moving the content to Improved cook stoves
I agree that the following sections should eventually be moved to Category:Improved cook stoves (maybe splitting off one or two into their own pages, such as Traditional three rock fire).
- 1 Traditional Three Rock Fire
- 2 Why Improved Fuel Stove are Good
- 3 Stove Programs
- 6 Literature review
I think that the remaining sections on design, testing and conclusions should be in a more specifically renamed project page. Such as Dan and Tyler rocket stove. Only Dan, Tyler or Lonny should do any of the content moving as this is a 305 project. Thank you, --Lonny 17:48, 20 April 2007 (PDT)
- Very good.
- A header template would be a good idea. Rather than a specific {{305}} template, it would be more useful to make a generic template of the form {{project page|Groupname}}, creating a notice that "this is a page by Groupname..." - perhaps with an additional option saying how open (or not) the group is to receiving edits by other people. --Chriswaterguy · talk 19:51, 20 April 2007 (PDT)
- I added a {{305inprogress}} notice, and a general {{Projectinprogress}} notice. We could definitely add a groupname, or author name(s), to the general template. Both of these templates add the page to Template:Tlc. --Lonny 01:55, 27 April 2007 (PDT)
Success of project
Dear project authors,
You state that this project was successful, but you do not analyze each criterion. For instance, the testing numbers are useful, but without a comparison they lose relevance. E.g. How much wood would be used in other systems to effect the same results?
Thank you, --Lonny 18:51, 16 May 2007 (PDT)