Editing Talk:CCAT rocket stove

==Regarding moving the content to [[Improved cook stoves]]==
I agree that the following sections should eventually be moved to [[:Category:Improved cook stoves]] (maybe splitting off one or two into their own pages, such as [[Traditional three rock fire]]).
:1 Traditional Three Rock Fire
:2 Why Improved Fuel Stove are Good
:3 Stove Programs
:6 Literature review

I think that the remaining sections on design, testing and conclusions should be in a more specifically renamed project page.  Such as [[Dan and Tyler rocket stove]].  Only Dan, Tyler or Lonny should do any of the content moving as this is a 305 project.  Thank you,  --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 17:48, 20 April 2007 (PDT)

:Very good. 

:A header template would be a good idea. Rather than a specific {{tl|305}} template, it would be more useful to make a generic template of the form <nowiki>{{project page|Groupname}}</nowiki>, creating a notice that "this is a page by Groupname..." - perhaps with an additional option saying how open (or not) the group is to receiving edits by other people. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] &middot; <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 19:51, 20 April 2007 (PDT)
::I added a {{Tl|305inprogress}} notice, and a general {{Tl|Projectinprogress}} notice.  We could definitely add a groupname, or author name(s), to the general template.  Both of these templates add the page to {{Cl|Project pages in progress}}.  --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 01:55, 27 April 2007 (PDT)
::I separated the Traditional three rock fire part to [[Three rock fire]].  How should we deal with Improved Cook Stove section?  Should we integrate it with [[Improved Cook Stoves]] or should we move some of it to [[Rocket stoves]]?  Thank you, --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 19:19, 16 May 2007 (PDT)

== Success of project ==

Dear project authors,

You state that this project was successful, but you do not analyze each criterion.  For instance, the testing numbers are useful, but without a comparison they lose relevance. E.g. How much wood would be used in other systems to effect the same results? 

Thank you,
--[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 18:51, 16 May 2007 (PDT)

== Project update ==
Testing will continue.
:That is great news.  Please continue to keep us updated.  The new captions are a good addition.  Thank you, --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 13:14, 25 June 2007 (PDT)
===Future Opportunities===
I am seeking information on internship and research opportunities involving the Lorena stove, rocket stove or any improved stove design. Please contact me with information. My email is danielmoyer24@gmail.com Thank You.
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 ===Future Opportunities===
 I am seeking information on internship and research opportunities involving the Lorena stove, rocket stove or any improved stove design. Please contact me with information. My email is danielmoyer24@gmail.com Thank You.
-== 308 Editing Comment ==
-Hey guys,
-It was interesting to hear how the rocket stove is doing now. However, some of the update section could be cleaned up a bit. Technical writing should be concise. For example, "After a short while the water began to boil and was brought to a rapid boil within 7 minutes and 25 seconds," could be better written as, "The water came to a rapid boil within 7 minutes and 25 seconds." This version is less wordy and gets to the point faster. Just something to consider when writing technical documents.
---[[User:MeghanHeintz|MeghanHeintz]] 21:00, 17 October 2011 (PDT)