m (Update Template:wp sup tag to Template:w) |
m (cat sort) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
[[Category:Sustainable development]] | [[Category:Sustainable development| ]] | ||
[[Category:Principles of development]] | [[Category:Principles of development]] | ||
[[Category:Sustainability]] | [[Category:Sustainability]] | ||
Revision as of 14:52, 11 January 2012
Sustainable development is the process of planning, designing and constructing in a way to cause no overall environmental burden. It can be seen as a "best fit" of the built environment to the natural environment.
Sustainable development is also used more broadly to describe financially and culturally sustainable development - that is, it accounts for all the financial needs and cultural context. This is closely related to the idea of appropriate development.
Poverty and sustainable development
International development can be boosted or held back by sustainable development concerns, depending on the context.
On the positive side, it can mean greater efficiency and lower resource use.
On the negative side, an excessive concern for the environmental impact of the poor could mean neglecting pressing needs, and may be inappropriate when their resource use is well below that of the rich. (See Tata Nano: The Paradox of Global Innovation, WorldChanging.com, blog post and comments, for a discussion of this issue.)
Brundtland Commissions
The definition of sustainable development has generally encapsulated some version of the Brundtland Commissions’W concept:
“development that meets the needs and aspirations of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”
(World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987:43). World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED).1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Questioning conventional models of development
The article Sustainable development is an oxymoron[1] argues that development programs have sometimes had a negative impact, by not only failing to achieve their aims, but also undermining simple living.
The "zero growth" and "post-growth" movements question even the idea of growth, although the definitions and focus of these arguments are open to question and their conclusions are controversial.
Notes
- ↑ Note: Marked as open license, but from a copyright source. Do not import extended portions to Appropedia