Warning! You are not logged in. Log in or create an account to have your edits attributed to your username rather than your IP, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Can Adapting Storage replace Agricultural AID?''' --[[User:WTLanier|WTLanier]] ([[User talk:WTLanier|talk]]) 17:11, 3 February 2014 (PST)<br />
'''Can Adapting Storage replace Agricultural AID?''' --[[User:WTLanier|WTLanier]] ([[User talk:WTLanier|talk]]) 17:11, 3 February 2014 (PST)<br />
'''Brief'''<br />
'''Summary:'''<br />
It is easy to read how African staple grain and pulse value chains are weak from Postharvest loss (PHL). Even though solutions to PHL  are available, smallholder growers suffer inputs that only increase production. Postharvest loss wastes crops —and related inputs, especially the labor that contributed to producing the wasted crop.<br />  
It is easy to read how African staple grain and pulse value chains are weak from Postharvest loss (PHL). Even though solutions to PHL  are available, smallholder growers suffer inputs that only increase production. Postharvest loss wastes crops —and related inputs, especially the labor that contributed to producing the wasted crop.<br />  


Line 35: Line 35:
Compare the utility of "idle - naive" with "neveridle - strategic". Then remove the cost of drudgery on culture and invest utility to improve food security, meaningfully.<br />
Compare the utility of "idle - naive" with "neveridle - strategic". Then remove the cost of drudgery on culture and invest utility to improve food security, meaningfully.<br />


'''Summary'''
Take home: There is evidence that Harvest tenure could contribute meaningful utility by replacing Postharvest loss with tactical and strategic marketing, grower net and Food security.<br />
There is evidence that Harvest tenure could contribute meaningful utility by replacing Postharvest loss with tactical and strategic marketing, grower net and Food security.<br />
   
   
[[Take home question]]
Take home question: Would Harvest tenure allow growers the peace of mind to: confront dis-empowerment, "idle - naive" reasons perpetuating PHL, staple grain and pulse imports, insecurity and ultimately AID?<br />
Would Harvest tenure allow growers the peace of mind to: confront dis-empowerment, "idle - naive" reasons perpetuating PHL, staple grain and pulse imports, insecurity and ultimately AID?<br />


<gallery>
<gallery>
Warning! All contributions to Appropedia are released under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license unless otherwise noted (see Appropedia:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here! You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted material without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.