Livestock: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:50, 4 July 2010

Environmental impact of livestock

Livestock have a large negative impact on the environment, through greenhouse gases, nitrogen pollution, deforestation, and ammonia, which contributes to acid rain.[2]

Livestock, when used for meat, also use far more resources than the same amount of nutrients in vegetable form (e.g. grains or legumes).

See Environmental impact of livestock for more detail.

Animal welfare

Factory farming, with its emphasis on production and efficiency through the accumulation of many small gains, causes many animal welfare problems.

Traditional farming may not have been concerned with the happiness of animals, but in its more natural setting, the animal was likely to have a more varied experience and room to move. Certified organic farming follows something closer to this model, and certification generally includes animal welfare criteria.^{[verification needed]}

Template:Stub

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Browsetopic}}
+{{topic header| default.png |Livestock}}
-Livestock are used in livestock banks, innovative [[microfinance]] schemes such as "cow banks" or "buffalo banks" <ref>[http://www.ockenden.org.uk/index.asp?id=494 Cow Banks – what are they?] - Ockenden Cambodia. accessed 15 December 2006</ref> They can be a valuable tool in development.
-==Environmental impact==
-Livestock have a large negative impact on the environment, through greenhouse gases, nitrogen pollution, deforestation, and ammonia, which contributes to acid rain.<ref>[http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2006/1000448/index.html Livestock a major threat to environment - Remedies urgently needed], ''{{WP|FAO}}, 29 November 2006.</ref>
-Livestock, when used for meat, also use far more resources than the same amount of nutrients in vegetable form (e.g. grains or legumes). This may be less true for animals which use resources not suitable for other uses, such as grass-fed cattle, where the land is not suffering from deforestation.
+== Environmental impact of livestock ==
-The greater resource use has economic as well as environmental implications; high consumption of animal products is also less desirable from a health point of view than a diet high in vegetables.
+Livestock have a large negative impact on the environment, through greenhouse gases, nitrogen pollution, deforestation, and ammonia, which contributes to acid rain.[2]
-It is important to note that the vast majority of this impact of excessive livestock rearing and consumption of animal products is due to consumption by wealthy countries. However, it is now becoming an issue for countries such as China, which now consumes more meat than the USA (though still much less on a per capita basis).
+Livestock, when used for meat, also use far more resources than the same amount of nutrients in vegetable form (e.g. grains or legumes).
-==Footnotes and references==
+See '''[[Environmental impact of livestock]]''' for more detail.
-<references/>
+== Animal welfare ==
+Factory farming, with its emphasis on production and efficiency through the accumulation of many small gains, causes many [[animal welfare]] problems.
+Traditional farming may not have been concerned with the happiness of animals, but in its more natural setting, the animal was likely to have a more varied experience and room to move. Certified [[organic farming]] follows something closer to this model, and certification generally includes animal welfare criteria.{{fact}}
+{{stub}}
 [[Category: Agriculture]]