No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
=== Specific harmful practices === | === Specific harmful practices === | ||
* Ducks mistake lead shot for gravel and swallow it though it is possible to by nonlead bird shot. | * Ducks mistake lead shot for gravel and swallow it though it is possible to by nonlead bird shot.[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22nonlead+shot%22] | ||
== External links== | == External links== | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 7 April 2008
Arguments in favor of hunting
Hunting is not a crime in any sense so long as the meat is needed and doesn't go to waste.
Hell most vegans still need to feed a cat or a dog so even they could go hunting for the right reasons.
In some cases hunting is a good thing since it keep animal populations from over population thus protecting the ecosystem.[1] (This is presumably the case when the top predators are no longer present - how does hunting compare with the actions of these predators? Can particular hunting practices help the ecosystem achieve a healthy state? [expansion needed])
Yes According to Jimmy Carter's book "Our endangered Values" [2].
In addition to these matters hunting and fishing licenses are needed to protect Americas wildlands.
Arguments against hunting
Specific harmful practices
- Ducks mistake lead shot for gravel and swallow it though it is possible to by nonlead bird shot.[3]
External links
Interest in Hunting, Fishing Dropping (AP) By DAVE GRAM, Mar 29, 2008