Difference between revisions of "Hexayurt sewage"

From Appropedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Options: Biogas toilet E.g. http://www.afrigadget.com/2007/03/01/bio-latrines-in-kenyan-slums/)
(linking, cleaning, etc)
Line 1: Line 1:
Substitute for pit latrines, septic systems or conventional sewage handling with:
+
Substitute for [[Sanitation|pit latrines, septic systems or conventional sewage handling]] with:
  
* area-appropriate composting toilet design
+
* area-appropriate [[composting toilet]] design
  
 
Financial model:
 
Financial model:
  
 
Possibly as cheap as $20 per household in warm areas, assuming shared toilet banks. Practical, realistic designs have not undergone the "value engineering" necessary for this application yet, so are still too costly, although clearly a cheap, basic, functional unit for any given climate could be created.
 
Possibly as cheap as $20 per household in warm areas, assuming shared toilet banks. Practical, realistic designs have not undergone the "value engineering" necessary for this application yet, so are still too costly, although clearly a cheap, basic, functional unit for any given climate could be created.
 +
 
Water System
 
Water System
  
Line 24: Line 25:
 
***Proven in the field, including Aceh.{{fact}}
 
***Proven in the field, including Aceh.{{fact}}
 
*Ultra-cheap systems, based on the [[Kamal Kar]]'s work. Any applicable to this situation? [[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] to find out.
 
*Ultra-cheap systems, based on the [[Kamal Kar]]'s work. Any applicable to this situation? [[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] to find out.
 +
*What about small community based [[Constructed wetlands]]?
  
 
+
[[Category:Hexayurt project]]
[[Category:Howtolive]]
 
[[Category:Hexayurt]]
 
 
[[Category:Toilet designs]]
 
[[Category:Toilet designs]]

Revision as of 23:59, 28 July 2007

Substitute for pit latrines, septic systems or conventional sewage handling with:

Financial model:

Possibly as cheap as $20 per household in warm areas, assuming shared toilet banks. Practical, realistic designs have not undergone the "value engineering" necessary for this application yet, so are still too costly, although clearly a cheap, basic, functional unit for any given climate could be created.

Water System

Priorities

  • public health is the overwhelming priority.
  • low cost is essential - if it's not cheap, it won't be used as much and won't achieve as much.
  • low ecological impact is very desirable if it doesn't compromise public health.
  • suitable for various cultural practices. Target users may be accustomed to using water to cleanse (but can most often cope with small amounts of water), or other anal cleansingDEPRECATED TEMPLATE - PLEASE USE {{W}} INSTEAD. methods, so the device should ideally tolerate sticks, rocks, paper, or whatever else is likely to be thrown in.

Options

  • Composting toilet
  • Biogas toilet, too large scale for the specs; for longer term settlement (due to capital cost, time for construction); relatively unproven. (E.g. Bio Latrines in Kenyan Slums.)
  • Non-composting, non-biogas toilets
    • Emphasis on public health (rather than sustainability or treating the waste as a resource).
    • e.g. the BiPuDEPRECATED TEMPLATE - PLEASE USE {{W}} INSTEAD.
  • Ultra-cheap systems, based on the Kamal Kar's work. Any applicable to this situation? Chriswaterguy to find out.
  • What about small community based Constructed wetlands?