(choose contrete plural rather than abstract countable for Category:Toilet designs)
(priorities and options)
Line 7: Line 7:
Possibly as cheap as $20 per household in warm areas, assuming shared toilet banks. Practical, realistic designs have not undergone the "value engineering" necessary for this application yet, so are still too costly, although clearly a cheap, basic, functional unit for any given climate could be created.
Possibly as cheap as $20 per household in warm areas, assuming shared toilet banks. Practical, realistic designs have not undergone the "value engineering" necessary for this application yet, so are still too costly, although clearly a cheap, basic, functional unit for any given climate could be created.
Water System
Water System
==Priorities==
*[[public health]] is the overwhelming priority.
*low cost is essential - if it's not cheap, it won't be used as much and won't achieve as much.
*low ecological impact is very desirable if it doesn't compromise public health.
*suitable for various [[culture|cultural]] practices. Target users may be accustomed to using water to cleanse (but can most often cope with small amounts of water), or other {{WP|anal cleansing}} methods, so the device should ideally tolerate sticks, rocks, paper, or whatever else is likely to be thrown in.
==Options==
*[[Composting toilet]]
*[[Biogas]] toilet, e.g.
*Non-composting toilets
**e.g. the {{WP|BiPu}}
***Cost? [[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] to find out.
***What's the status of the solid material afterwards? Can be composted?
***Proven in the field, including Aceh.{{fact}}
*Ultra-cheap systems, based on the [[Kamal Kar]]'s work. Any applicable to this situation? [[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] to find out.


[[Category:Howtolive]]
[[Category:Howtolive]]
[[Category:Hexayurt]]
[[Category:Hexayurt]]
[[Category:Toilet designs]]
[[Category:Toilet designs]]

Revision as of 03:15, 26 April 2007

Substitute for pit latrines, septic systems or conventional sewage handling with:

  • area-appropriate composting toilet design

Financial model:

Possibly as cheap as $20 per household in warm areas, assuming shared toilet banks. Practical, realistic designs have not undergone the "value engineering" necessary for this application yet, so are still too costly, although clearly a cheap, basic, functional unit for any given climate could be created. Water System

Priorities

  • public health is the overwhelming priority.
  • low cost is essential - if it's not cheap, it won't be used as much and won't achieve as much.
  • low ecological impact is very desirable if it doesn't compromise public health.
  • suitable for various cultural practices. Target users may be accustomed to using water to cleanse (but can most often cope with small amounts of water), or other W methods, so the device should ideally tolerate sticks, rocks, paper, or whatever else is likely to be thrown in.

Options

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.